proactive
Enjoying a drop of red.
Only a matter of time.I wonder how long before people have to get used to the concept of Pupil Loans to fund their primary and secondary education?
Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
Only a matter of time.I wonder how long before people have to get used to the concept of Pupil Loans to fund their primary and secondary education?
You could take it up at the ballot box at the next election, except for the fact that all parties are in favour of the current formula.
My Googling (other search engines available) turned up this Parliamentary Briefing which suggests the formula by which the money is allocated is due to change in 2018-19 as a result of policy decisions made by the Con-Dem coalition.
Good find. I think this is something Lefroy has been lobbying on for some time, for whatever that is worth.My Googling (other search engines available) turned up this Parliamentary Briefing which suggests the formula by which the money is allocated is due to change in 2018-19 as a result of policy decisions made by the Con-Dem coalition.
Good find. I think this is something Lefroy has been lobbying on for some time, for whatever that is worth.
Possibly true, but the poor funding in Staffs pre-dates that. It was certainly in place 12 years ago when DD started primary school.
In answer to the question, on a good day they take our money then squander it, particularly on paying unaccountable and impossible to get rid of chief executives. On an bad day, councils are totally corrupt. In Stafford's case this is/was fact, not a conspiracy theory. Google "George Newman bribes"
So, one Councillor, convicted 40 years ago. Hardly a basis for stating that councils are totally corrupt...
You said that unaccountable and impossible to get rid of chief executives were employed. The man you reference was the Leader, an elected member, not the Chief Executive. Which other officials were convicted? It was 40 years ago. I don't see how a case from that long ago is relevant to the work of the Council today, in a totally different era, when priorities and responsibilities are different.
Of course taking bribes for any reason, planning or otherwise is corrupt. You stated that councils are totally corrupt. I don't think that the one case you reference makes all councils totally corrupt.
There will always be rotten apples in every industry, where that is the case they need to be stopped and prosecuted. Whether that is local authority or private sector is irrelevant. But you can't then tar every identical organisation with the same brush.
Indeed. They can also be raised about the leadership under Mr (I'm sorry I forgot to mention I'm a director of businesses that bring about a conflict of interest) Heenan.Certainly there can be reaonable questions raised about the Head of Leisure and conflicting interestes with the Rugby club disgrace imo!
Click here to see what Google returns.Google "George Newman bribes"
So why aren't the council and Lefroy fighting to get a level playing field, i.e the same amount for each kid? I see no signs of such
Why can't you argue a point without getting nasty and personal. Every post you make is a personal insult to someone with a different opinion to yourself, and some of them are shameful.
Proactive has made no insult at all. He has very accurately correcting a couple of your points and he is spot on in his comment about education funding, education and unfairness and being personal at all.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but inaccurate information and statements stand to be corrected, happens to everyone but it is not personal.
The whole education and funding thing has nothing to do with the borough council, never has to my knowledge.