Search results

I think my points on this thread are now done. I have tried to answer questions though I realise some feel I have not. We will see what the next series of legal challenges does. It seems some people are prepared to invest a lot of their time and other peoples money to deny the town the...

It is interesting to note that in writing this no mention is made of Blackberry Lane and the fact that it was not flooded this week. Also probably worthy of note that the River Sow does not adjoin the site in any way either at the overflow car park or anywhere. Both facts which would be useful

I have been away and then somewhat busy so apologies for slow reply. I have several comments on the SWT report too many to put on this forum. I am delighted that it confirms the notion (which has been previously dismissed here) that nearly 3Ha (aprox 7 acres or 4 rugby pitches) will be...

I think it is fair to say that it is a bit more complex. But yes SBC asked the court to set aside the approval on the basis of the EIA screning form and the court accepted this.

How many immediate local residents objected from over 100 houses? How many members of SWT?

I have asked before but did you have a location in mind that meets the regulations.

Just watching the comments. Nothing really for me to comment on.

I have finally managed to spot the various edits - been along weekend. Difficult to comment on the different highlighted points but one stuck out about moving. We will be able to move the club without grants - it will just not be as good as it could have been. I want the best possible facility...

A erudite post if ever I saw one. Seems the debate is so much more complete now. I would not be so hard on yourself though

Not sure I ever read that

I am utterly confused by this point.

I do know myself - this is of course a foolish oversight by me and I apologise unreservedly if I misled people into thinking otherwise.

Trust me none of my business interests has one iota to do with anything here.

I think who is consulted is a matter of law - I am sure you will tell me if I am wrong. I am happy to be open and public just not always sure of relevance of information - which could be perceived by the more cynical to perhaps be just throwing out useless information to create a false...

So it appears that "bandwagon" has jumped on a bandwagon and feels joining to post names and troll peoples social media is the purpose of this forum. Interesting! Why not come on in your own name and do the same.

It may seem that a few are. I certainly joined to address this thread. Perhaps over time I may evolve to others - this seems to take to much time already

I cannot possibly keep track of all questions. I have tried to answer questions where I can. Not sure what issues I have missed but there you go. I have tried to engage in an open an honest manner.

This would be the local councillor who sent in a withdrawal of objection saying she had no issues now but could we ensure boundary fence was good.

Was not meant to be a test

I agree many have been very open to a reasonable discussion. I came on here to try and respond to a number of allegations etc that seemed to be being made. I have perhaps done nothing to assuage these but that was my intent. I think some have very genuine concerns and I have tried to address...