Here's a review of United 93. I suspect this fella (or lass) spends far too much time on the net and has posters of Mulder and Skully on his (or her) wall:
The Biggest Hoax in US History, 7 Jan 2007
Reviewer: 'V' - See all my reviews
The film is very good indeed, but the problem is, i give only 1 star as it's just pure fiction !
Anyone with a minimal intelligence will revise all evidence and events that fateful day and conclude that the 6 metre hole left at the scene of Flight 93's 'impact' into the ground, was a hoax.
The hole should have been massive and the ground around the immediate area completely charred and scattered with plane parts, luggage, seats, bodies and there would have been massive hull, and wing and tail sections.....instead the reports and eyewitnesses including police statements say that there was a hole thta looked like someone with a shovel dug a small hole, and scattered a few nuts and bolts around the area !
There were never any plane sections, neither wings, tail, motors found, let alone bodies, luggage, seats etc, and the massive fuel tanks ought have left alot of burning fuel and charred ground, but instead there was just an empty hole and no fires, and quite a nice piece of clean surrounding grass area ! I guess the government statement, as with the pentagon 'plane', says that the plane disintergrated or pulverized, but you know, this is not the case, as look at Lockerbie, and other plane crashes or planes brought down by explosions or otherwise, and they leave lots of damage, and wreckage, engines, not just 'nothing' !
The Pentagon was also a 3 metred hole with no wing damage and a clean Pentagon lawn !!! and there was the remains of a US type missle with a small turbofan engine, and no plane wreckage the likes of which we expect, no bodies, nothing, just as in the case of flight 93 as explained above !
Of course, the government said the plane just vaporized on impact, and claim the impact caused there to be no evidence whatsoever of a plane due to this 'fact', but you know, this just points to an even bigger coverup, as if anyone reading this believes that a plane as big as that or any for that matter, can just turn to dust on impact, then think that even when aeroplanes crash into mountains (which are harder than the pentagon !) they leave lots of wreckage and scattered remins of bodies and luggage, engines, wing sections and tail sections and main sections etc.....so if they don't just 'pulverize' in those instances, I doubt you can really question what i am saying when I say the government is covering up a self inflicted terrorist strike againts their own people to justify invasion of other nations for gaining of power, land, oil, and enforcing draconian laws on the populace to furthur a more sinister plan which will fruition in the next 10 years....this is all for a single goal of '1984' style control and government dictatorship which is in the near future if people keep hiding form the facts, and watch such propagandarist films and believe the trash in them which are made to brainwash people and indoctrinate false history into the coming generations.....
The twin towers fell from a controlled demolision, and so go do your own research as if you beleive a few fires on the top floors of a skyscraper built to take multiple aircraft impacts, could have honestly crumbled to dust falling at the same speed as gravity and leaving nothing but a cloud, then you must really learn some physics and laws of science !
Also ask why tower 7 fell a few hours later and wasn't hit or damaged by any aeroplanes, but fell as fats and in the same 'controlled demolition' way as the twin towers did !
back to Flight 93, it didn't crash, and airtraffic controllers ordered to destroy evidence but some of which saved documents and leaked recorded flightpath data, said that flight 93 is still registered as a working plane, and has been renumbered, but did indeed land and the passengers told there was a terror incident and so were accompanied to a Nasa hanger in the vicinity, and were never seen again until the 'autopsy reports' held later said their remains were 'found' at the scene of Flight 93, even though we are told the plane left no wreckage other than a few small bolts and shards of small metal fragments which were dubious !
The sinioster thing is the flight which was meant to hit the pentagon also landed etc.....
check out a decent documentary, google search 'Loose change', and 'Hoboken', and do a search and check the facts, don't take my word for it, as 89% of Americans when taking part in online polls, say they believe 911 was an inside job, so Bush and Hollywood can do what they like, but people are waking up.....
