Mr Lefroy Set To Make A Big Announcement On Monday ?

basil

don't mention the blinds
Wondering who paid the Midlands and Lancashire CSU to produce this report?

It is littered with picture symbols on circles and; You said -We said, Where we are - Where we might be.

I may have missed the sentence where a named person says what they propose to do about it.......
 

basil

don't mention the blinds
On meeting Jezza twice in the last year I have pressed him on two things,; Pedestrian priority at Newport rd and Station Rd and the predicament of the SDGH/County Hospital on both occasions I have drawn a blank. The guy is not up to the job and should resign.....
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
On meeting Jezza twice in the last year I have pressed him on two things,; Pedestrian priority at Newport rd and Station Rd and the predicament of the SDGH/County Hospital on both occasions I have drawn a blank. The guy is not up to the job and should resign.....
He doesn't have to be up to the job - as long as 48.5% of the electorate vote for him.

And his 'job' may not be what we might wish it to be.
 

basil

don't mention the blinds
Electorate questions with Y/N answers

Pedestrian priority at Newport rd station Rd ?

Ensure NHS is delivered

Tell us where you now stand on brexit and if you are prepared to vote against the government because you know that the people you represent will be disadvantaged by brexit
even though they voted for brexit.... Oh ffs! ..
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
Electorate questions with Y/N answers

Pedestrian priority at Newport rd station Rd ?

Ensure NHS is delivered

Tell us where you now stand on brexit and if you are prepared to vote against the government because you know that the people you represent will be disadvantaged by brexit
even though they voted for brexit.... Oh ffs! ..
It's largely a waste of everybody's time, to be fair.

If ability was a job prerequisite, then we'd have no politicians left and most large companies would be without their CEO and directors.
There may not be a universal understanding of what his 'job' is - we get to vote on who the MP is, that's it.

What he does after he is elected, and who he really works for, is nothing whatsoever to do with us.
 

PhoneyGeek

A few posts under my belt
When I contacted him about marriage equality, he assured me that by voting against the planned changes, he was serving the interests of his mostly older constituents. Apparently forgetting that it's us young constituents that will be voting for him in 10-15 years when the old ones have died off.
 

c0tt0nt0p

Well-Known Forumite
When I contacted him about marriage equality, he assured me that by voting against the planned changes, he was serving the interests of his mostly older constituents. Apparently forgetting that it's us young constituents that will be voting for him in 10-15 years when the old ones have died off.
You can't make it up....
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
If you want to influence the choice of Stafford's MP, then you really need to join the Conservative Association - who they choose will, almost inevitably, be the elected member for the foreseeable future.
 

tek-monkey

wanna see my snake?
Odd really. Everyone knows they will screw us over terribly, but most are scared in case anyone else screws us over other than them.
 

Sir BoD

Well-Known Forumite
Odd really. Everyone knows they will screw us over terribly, but most are scared in case anyone else screws us over other than them.
This ^. The only 'power' we have over 'them' is when we vote. The in between bit when they're in, the most important part, is where we have absolutely no control, and boy don't most know it.
 

PeterD

ST16 Represent.
When I contacted him about marriage equality, he assured me that by voting against the planned changes, he was serving the interests of his mostly older constituents. Apparently forgetting that it's us young constituents that will be voting for him in 10-15 years when the old ones have died off.
Same question and same response.
 

PhoneyGeek

A few posts under my belt
Why is it in the interests of his older constituents I wonder?

He said that his older constituents had contacted him to say they didn't approve of it. I know that myself and at least a few other "young" (mid-20's) people had contacted him to express support for equalisation and, as PeterD has said, all got the same response.

As for why he only cares about his older constituents, it comes down to the fact that old people tend to vote more than young people and politics is a popularity game now instead of a 'trying to better the country'-game
 

proactive

Enjoying a drop of red.
He said that his older constituents had contacted him to say they didn't approve of it. I know that myself and at least a few other "young" (mid-20's) people had contacted him to express support for equalisation and, as PeterD has said, all got the same response.

As for why he only cares about his older constituents, it comes down to the fact that old people tend to vote more than young people and politics is a popularity game now instead of a 'trying to better the country'-game
What he actually means by old constituents is the old farts who inhabit the Conservative Association. Not usually famed for their tolerance of different persuasions...
 
Top