Coronavirus.

PeterD

ST16 Represent.
AB is now out of parliament but explains his qualifications and the evidence is building, although a lot of it has been there all along. This Myers fella is seriously out of his depth up against him.
I won't contribute to the viewing figures of GB News so you say Bridgen explains his qualifications, is it a degree in virology, or something similar?
 

Mudgie

Well-Known Forumite
I won't contribute to the viewing figures of GB News so you say Bridgen explains his qualifications, is it a degree in virology, or something similar?
"In his parliamentary career he supported efforts to remove Conservative prime ministers David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Liz Truss from office"
That's probably all that can be said in favour of him !!
 

gilbert grape

Well-Known Forumite
I won't contribute to the viewing figures of GB News so you say Bridgen explains his qualifications, is it a degree in virology, or something similar?
It's a list of such qualifications. I wasn't aware he was that qualified and I doubt many more MPs are.
I say this as a non Tory, by the way.
 

gilbert grape

Well-Known Forumite
"In his parliamentary career he supported efforts to remove Conservative prime ministers David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Liz Truss from office"
That's probably all that can be said in favour of him !!
We can all be blinkered by our bias. I tend to listen to other views so I can base my opinion. I'm guessing you haven;t listened to the interview, his speech, or read any of the latest info? Thought not.
 

rudie111

Well-Known Forumite
Wife has Covid for the 2nd time just over a year since her first bout. She should be entitled to anti viral medication. We are waiting for a call back (should have been at some point yesterday).

Symptoms are cough, temperature, tiredness and just generally feeling unwell.
 

PeterD

ST16 Represent.
It's a list of such qualifications. I wasn't aware he was that qualified and I doubt many more MPs are.
I say this as a non Tory, by the way.
Biological sciences does not make you an expert in viruses and the potential harm of vaccines. It doesnt. Its like that nurse who is championed by your lot, she isnt an expert at all. Because someone has a platform and a science degree, why should they be believed over someone who has devoted a lifetime and is considered an expert in their field. Bridgen could start a fight in an empty room, that is where his talent lies and not in vaccines and covid.
 

Mudgie

Well-Known Forumite
We can all be blinkered by our bias. I tend to listen to other views so I can base my opinion. I'm guessing you haven;t listened to the interview, his speech, or read any of the latest info? Thought not.
"Thought not" before I've had a chance to answer your question indicates that "tend to listen to other views" isn't how you do things, so you're as "blinkered" as anyone on here.
 

gilbert grape

Well-Known Forumite
"Thought not" before I've had a chance to answer your question indicates that "tend to listen to other views" isn't how you do things, so you're as "blinkered" as anyone on here.
I had gauged, going by your previous response, that you hadn't read the info or even watched the link.
 

joshua

Well-Known Forumite
When you have to resort to believing anything a tory politician (let alone a crooked, lying, homophobic, antisemitic, etc) says then you really have to give your head a wobble (careful not to dislodge you tinfoil hat)
 

Mudgie

Well-Known Forumite
I had gauged, going by your previous response, that you hadn't read the info or even watched the link.
My previous response - about Bridgen supporting efforts to remove four consecutive Conservative prime ministers - would have been exactly the same whether I've listened to the interview and his speech and read any of the latest information or not listened to the interview and his speech and read any of the latest information, and you don't know whether I have or have not done so.
You can gauge as much as you like and you might be right or you might be wrong.
If I have listened to the interview and his speech and read any of the latest information am I meant to agree with him ?
Now I risk getting drawn into an absolutely pointless dialogue with you, something I've managed to avoid over the past couple of years.
 

SketchyMagpie

Well-Known Forumite
Is Bridgen still using data published by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency which the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency themselves say did not apply to Covid vaccines or the pandemic, Gilbert? Because that issue was raised a previous time you mentioned him and ever resolved.
 

gilbert grape

Well-Known Forumite
Is Bridgen still using data published by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency which the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency themselves say did not apply to Covid vaccines or the pandemic, Gilbert? Because that issue was raised a previous time you mentioned him and ever resolved.
As he refers to new case and ongoing releases, it indicates he isn't referring to old data!
 

gilbert grape

Well-Known Forumite
His ongoing work wouldn't be ingoing unless he was using what he sees as the truth.
You've always believed that everything from certain bodies is gospel and that it could never be in doubt, or even there to cover up what they are up to. In a similar way that the majority on here, damn the government for most things they say or do, but then swallow everything they tell them about Covid, I believe Bridgen on this matter as it's been spoken about for the duration. Some people who really struggle with grasping alternative thinking, seem to just revert to name calling if they cant grasp the concept of things not actually being as they've been told! Many foil hat wearers play on that name as they get proved right on so many matters, day after day.
 

gilbert grape

Well-Known Forumite
This tells anyone all they need to know about the sanity of Andrew Bridgen.

Not really. It tells you, what you want to know, about how to try and prove him and me wrong.
I don't wave a "I love Andrew" banner! you muppet!
 

SketchyMagpie

Well-Known Forumite
You've always believed that everything from certain bodies is gospel and that it could never be in doubt, or even there to cover up what they are up to.

Not at all, I just believe that what organisations who do research have to say about the results of their research has greater relevance than what people (usually grifters weaponising outrage for profit) who were not involved in any way, shape or form have to say.
 
Last edited:

gilbert grape

Well-Known Forumite
I'll give you the points for the Reclaim thing!Not a good move!

However, the points raised by him, and an increasing number of others, are valid, relevant and that evidence has built.
3 years ago, jabs were nearly 100% effective, tested and safe or so it was claimed.
Some were totally against them and some were sceptical. If you did as you were told, the chances were that you could possibly even lambast and disown anybody that dared not get in line!
As the figures were rising, they even changed how yellow card figures were reported. How bloody convenient!
This range of jabs have caused more damage, side effects and deaths than all the well known vaccine schemes. They are increasingly advised not to be delivered to kids, as they don't need them and could also suffer damage. I find it heart breaking that young lives could be effected by being forced to take something that has way more chance of damaging than any virus!
Most searched results will deny this as they are from bodies that make sure their results and articles appear way up the rankings rather than those that question the narrative.

Pointing the finger and making tin hat comments has made you look increasingly stupid, as time has gone on, so just don't bother! It just shows your inability to open your mind.
 

PeterD

ST16 Represent.
I'll give you the points for the Reclaim thing!Not a good move!

However, the points raised by him, and an increasing number of others, are valid, relevant and that evidence has built.
3 years ago, jabs were nearly 100% effective, tested and safe or so it was claimed.
Some were totally against them and some were sceptical. If you did as you were told, the chances were that you could possibly even lambast and disown anybody that dared not get in line!
As the figures were rising, they even changed how yellow card figures were reported. How bloody convenient!
This range of jabs have caused more damage, side effects and deaths than all the well known vaccine schemes. They are increasingly advised not to be delivered to kids, as they don't need them and could also suffer damage. I find it heart breaking that young lives could be effected by being forced to take something that has way more chance of damaging than any virus!
Most searched results will deny this as they are from bodies that make sure their results and articles appear way up the rankings rather than those that question the narrative.

Pointing the finger and making tin hat comments has made you look increasingly stupid, as time has gone on, so just don't bother! It just shows your inability to open your mind.
I started responding to this with data and sources but genuinely I don’t think it’s worth it. You are in too deep and facts if they don’t meet your confirmation bias will be brushed aside. Good luck Gilbert, I hope friends and family you do listen to are doing their best to pull you out of this.
 
Top