Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
Soooooooo, whats the lifespan of a windturbine & the annual maintanance of Hugh without replacement parts? & what about energy storage costs & energy supplier buyback commision?
Are they all called Hugh, or do they have other names?
Aren't you just the perfect little ray of sunshine a?Wind turbines are ugly and uneconomical!
They are subsidised by the government so they can reach some half-arsed 'green' target!
thing with wind turbines the amount of energy they produce isn't constant. when the wind stops blowing there is no electric produced. going to be controversial here and say at present nuclear will likely need to play a bigger part in meeting energy demand /security in the medium to long term. but i am hopeful that one day the problems with hydrogen can be ironed out to give cheap limitless supply of clean energy
Nuclear power is probably the way they will go but it scares the hell out of me!
Nuclear power is probably the way they will go but it scares the hell out of me!
Flossietoo & I discussed this very thing on our recent cycle excursion - passing, as we did, at least one 'down with this sort of thing' area. We were very much in favour.
Personally i would favour them even more if they were all called Hugh, though i wouldn't care to speak for Flossietoo on this front.
I concur. They should all be called Hugh. Even the lady ones.
Compared with most of the rest of the country Staffordshire is distinctly lacking in them. Mainly down to the "it will spoil the view from my windows" crowd. You don't want turbines or pylons near you then you should have the electricity supply to your house cut off.
My (retired generating engineer) father once propounded after a glass of wine that when nimbyish types objected to wind farms it should be considered an automatic agreement to a coal power station in the same spot.....