Proposed Change of Use - Stafford Court, Beaconside.

tek-monkey

wanna see my snake?
Asylum seekers spend money to travel to France, where they then pay thousands each to smugglers, only to then be denied the ability to work and have to sit there for 18 months doing nothing.

Why don't we let them come through a legal route, but charge them the money they were paying smugglers? Process their claims faster than the arse backwards system we currently have and they could have zero cost then fill the farm jobs that are desperately in need of workers.

But then who could we blame for tory policy? 🤔
 

Cue

Well-Known Forumite
Ah good, after the attacks on hotels elsewhere in the country I’m sure nothing bad will come of filming themselves outside Stafford Court.

I mostly say this because I don’t think the folk carrying out these attacks are intelligent enough to read a map, so they need a clear shot of the place to understand where to commit arson.
 

joshua

Well-Known Forumite
Oh !



Travellers are on at the Beaconside Gym part of The New Beacon Group property (by the part Stafford House where Serco wish to place asylum seekers). They have been served notice and will be leaving today, previously they accessed the New Beacon Enterprise Park where all the business are, pre-empting their movement NBG barriers will be closed from 6.30pm each evening until 8am the next morning and closed all weekend therefore there is no access each night and over weekend. Anyone wishing to drop donations off to 💞 Hearts & Hands 👐 Stafford or Childhood Cancer Parents Alliance Ccpa Stafford will not be able too. Scouts meeting etc will not be able to take place. An email was sent out at 4.20pm this afternoon.
At Hearts & Hands we have put into place an emergency action plan for this weekend so our surplus tables still will go out at this weekend
 

bunique

Well-Known Forumite
Hearts and Hands have decided the new residents will all be criminals and has given notice on its current site.
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
Hearts and Hands have decided the new residents will all be criminals and has given notice on its current site.
The new regime on the barriers might be at least part of the reason they wish to move. (June 22nd)

"Travellers are on at the Beaconside Gym part of The New Beacon Group property (by the part Stafford Court where Serco wish to place asylum seekers). They have been served notice and will be leaving today, previously they accessed the New Beacon Enterprise Park where all the business are, pre-empting their movement NBG barriers will be closed from 6.30pm each evening until 8am the next morning and closed all weekend therefore there is no access each night and over weekend. Anyone wishing to drop donations off to
💞
Hearts & Hands Stafford
👐
or Childhood Cancer Parents Alliance will not be able to. Scouts meeting etc will not be able to take place. An email was sent out at 4.20pm this afternoon.
At Hearts & Hands we have put into place an emergency action plan for this weekend so our surplus tables still will go out at this weekend"


 

joshua

Well-Known Forumite

Home Office defeats residents to put 481 asylum seekers in Staffordshire complex​

The former Staffordshire University accommodation will now house up to 481 asylum seekers


Stafford Court, the former Staffordshire University halls of residence at Beaconside, Stafford

Stafford Court, the former Staffordshire University halls of residence at Beaconside, Stafford






Hundreds of asylum seekers can be housed in former university accommodation in Stafford after a planning inspector overturned a council decision. Stafford Borough Council refused to grant Serco permission to change the use of the Beaconside site last year after concerns were raised about social inclusivity, the impact on public health services, and fear of crime.

Serco, which manages asylum seeker accommodation on behalf of the Home Office, appealed against the decision and a public inquiry was held at Stafford Rugby Club last month. Representatives of Serco said there was an urgent and pressing need to provide accommodation for asylum seekers and police had raised no objections to the proposals for Stafford Court.

But several residents and councillors spoke against the plans at the hearing, voicing safety fears and highlighting the site's location near local schools. One likened the accommodation to a 'prison cell', while others raised concerns that far-right groups could visit the site to stage protests.

Members of local refugee support groups also spoke at the hearing. And one - a former refugee herself - spoke of her experiences of meeting with asylumn seekers in Cannock and said she wanted to "assuage fears" expressed by residents.


Planning inspector Gareth Jones' decision on the proposals was published today. He has granted permission for the change of use of Stafford Court to become asylum seeker accommodation until the end of July 2029, subject to a series of conditions including limiting bedspaces to 481.


Before the site is occupied details must be submitted of how the outdoor courtyard space will be managed, and security measures including CCTV and site boundary treatments must be approved. A medical facility must also be in place and operational on the site before asylum seekers move into Stafford Court.

Mr Jones' decision notice stated: "It is clear that very many local people hold genuine, strong concerns regarding how the proposed development might affect crime and over how residents of the site might behave. It is an unfortunate reality that crime and fear of it form part of our society.


"While regrettable, it is unsurprising, therefore, that criminal cases and anti-social behaviour involving asylum seekers does occur, as cited in many of the submissions before me, including as raised by those who spoke during the inquiry. There is no compelling evidence, however, that criminal activity is more prevalent or extreme amongst asylum seekers than amongst the wider population.

"The appeal site is located close to family homes, schools and a nursery, as well as to recreational and other community facilities and infrastructure used by children. Parents, teachers and the wider community understandably and quite rightly want to ensure the wellbeing and safeguarding of children.

"Nonetheless, notwithstanding any cultural differences, there is no compelling evidence before me to indicate that when compared to the wider population asylum seekers, including single men, pose a greater risk to children or indeed any other group. No such concerns have been expressed by the management teams of local schools, the local education authority or the police.

"Concerns have been expressed by interested parties regarding the size of the rooms that would be provided for residents of the appeal property, including that this may lead to asylum seekers congregating off-site. The council, however, has not objected to the scheme on the basis of room size.

"I also note that the proposed accommodation would exceed what would be required were it to be subject to Housing in Multiple Occupation licensing. Although residents would be free to come and go from the premises, the courtyard area is substantial and would offer a pleasant, spacious environment for them to spend time outside without having to leave the site."
 

Feed The Goat

Well-Known Forumite

Home Office defeats residents to put 481 asylum seekers in Staffordshire complex​

The former Staffordshire University accommodation will now house up to 481 asylum seekers


Stafford Court, the former Staffordshire University halls of residence at Beaconside, Stafford

Stafford Court, the former Staffordshire University halls of residence at Beaconside, Stafford






Hundreds of asylum seekers can be housed in former university accommodation in Stafford after a planning inspector overturned a council decision. Stafford Borough Council refused to grant Serco permission to change the use of the Beaconside site last year after concerns were raised about social inclusivity, the impact on public health services, and fear of crime.

Serco, which manages asylum seeker accommodation on behalf of the Home Office, appealed against the decision and a public inquiry was held at Stafford Rugby Club last month. Representatives of Serco said there was an urgent and pressing need to provide accommodation for asylum seekers and police had raised no objections to the proposals for Stafford Court.

But several residents and councillors spoke against the plans at the hearing, voicing safety fears and highlighting the site's location near local schools. One likened the accommodation to a 'prison cell', while others raised concerns that far-right groups could visit the site to stage protests.

Members of local refugee support groups also spoke at the hearing. And one - a former refugee herself - spoke of her experiences of meeting with asylumn seekers in Cannock and said she wanted to "assuage fears" expressed by residents.


Planning inspector Gareth Jones' decision on the proposals was published today. He has granted permission for the change of use of Stafford Court to become asylum seeker accommodation until the end of July 2029, subject to a series of conditions including limiting bedspaces to 481.


Before the site is occupied details must be submitted of how the outdoor courtyard space will be managed, and security measures including CCTV and site boundary treatments must be approved. A medical facility must also be in place and operational on the site before asylum seekers move into Stafford Court.

Mr Jones' decision notice stated: "It is clear that very many local people hold genuine, strong concerns regarding how the proposed development might affect crime and over how residents of the site might behave. It is an unfortunate reality that crime and fear of it form part of our society.


"While regrettable, it is unsurprising, therefore, that criminal cases and anti-social behaviour involving asylum seekers does occur, as cited in many of the submissions before me, including as raised by those who spoke during the inquiry. There is no compelling evidence, however, that criminal activity is more prevalent or extreme amongst asylum seekers than amongst the wider population.

"The appeal site is located close to family homes, schools and a nursery, as well as to recreational and other community facilities and infrastructure used by children. Parents, teachers and the wider community understandably and quite rightly want to ensure the wellbeing and safeguarding of children.

"Nonetheless, notwithstanding any cultural differences, there is no compelling evidence before me to indicate that when compared to the wider population asylum seekers, including single men, pose a greater risk to children or indeed any other group. No such concerns have been expressed by the management teams of local schools, the local education authority or the police.

"Concerns have been expressed by interested parties regarding the size of the rooms that would be provided for residents of the appeal property, including that this may lead to asylum seekers congregating off-site. The council, however, has not objected to the scheme on the basis of room size.

"I also note that the proposed accommodation would exceed what would be required were it to be subject to Housing in Multiple Occupation licensing. Although residents would be free to come and go from the premises, the courtyard area is substantial and would offer a pleasant, spacious environment for them to spend time outside without having to leave the site."
There, there, stop being such silly billys, Uncle Gareth says your daughters will be just fine walking to Weston Road school.
 

Wormella

Well-Known Forumite
It is very odd that people are complaining about the room sizes - they arn't huge but perfectly fine for short term living, and no one complained when they were built for students - Kitchens are a decent size too - I hope whoever gets my old room has a pleasent stay, although I used to have a view over fields and I don't suppose they'll have that any more due to the houses built since.
 

Cue

Well-Known Forumite
It is very odd that people are complaining about the room sizes - they arn't huge but perfectly fine for short term living, and no one complained when they were built for students - Kitchens are a decent size too - I hope whoever gets my old room has a pleasent stay, although I used to have a view over fields and I don't suppose they'll have that any more due to the houses built since.
People will look for anything to use as an argument as long as it means they don’t have to say the quiet bit out loud.
 
Top