What's the worst film you've ever seen/favourite film?

db

#chaplife
Gramaisc said:
Best - If....

Worst - Dumb and Dumber I got so bored I nearly cut my thumb off with an axe.
i love dumb & dumber :haw:

"I DESPERATELY WANT TO MAKE LOVE TO A SCHOOLBOY :gonk:"

lol brilliant..
 

shoes

Well-Known Forumite
Worst film ever has got to be either titanic or spider man 3. I haven't decided yet, i cried after both, titanic because I had literally wasted about a year (or so it felt) of my life watching that drivvel and spider man 3 because it cost me £6.50 to have my life wasted. Should have gone on a wednesday...

Best.... probably requiem for a dream.
 

shoes

Well-Known Forumite
Monquey said:
Worst: Star Wars Episodes 1-3. :grr:
In fact any of them, worst series of films EVER.

As ever I disagree with the masses on this point, i have not found a single minute of Star Wars entertaining. I'd sooner watch the director's cut of the Tellytubbies movie. Would make more sense too.
 

tek-monkey

wanna see my snake?
shoes said:
As ever I disagree with the masses on this point, i have not found a single minute of Star Wars entertaining. I'd sooner watch the director's cut of the Tellytubbies movie. Would make more sense too.
Star Wars was a major part of my childhood, not just the films but the toys too. It was the first and only franchise I was actually interested in, and I still have a lot of the toys at my mums! The thing is, it was from my childhood. The effects were groundbreaking and the sheer size of the film was immense - back then. In your childhood it was already old hat, I'd be suprised if you did feel anything like what I do for it.
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
Thre would appear to be a new version of Tales of the Riverbank out recently - but without real animals! What is the point of that? There are people involved who clearly should know better than to desecrate such a cultural icon. I might be getting the axe out again.
 

shoes

Well-Known Forumite
tek-monkey said:
Spiderman 3 is by far the worst I've paid to see, put me off the cinema for a while!
Didn't we go and see it together? Can't believe MyCult and chums left me sat there, i thought theyd gone the bog and turned out they'd walked out the cinema and into the pub. Left me there with the crying girlies and Kez who was pretty much drooling over black spiderman.

Weak!
 

Monquey

Dressed like Cadfael
shoes said:
I'd sooner watch the director's cut of the Tellytubbies movie. Would make more sense too.
Roll me a fat one, and I'm there.

tek-monkey said:
Star Wars was a major part of my childhood, not just the films but the toys too. It was the first and only franchise I was actually interested in, and I still have a lot of the toys at my mums! The thing is, it was from my childhood. The effects were groundbreaking and the sheer size of the film was immense - back then. In your childhood it was already old hat, I'd be suprised if you did feel anything like what I do for it.
This. Which is what made the new ones even worse - not only were they a pile of splew, they served to highlight the iniquities of the originals.

Even if you didn't like Star Wars, perhaps Indiana Jones was a treasured memory from your childhood? Seen Crystal Skull?

Lucas - step away editing suite, and put the camera down.
 

Toble

Well-Known Forumite
ODB_69 said:
sorry but its truly awful...usually I dont mind bad films, I can lol @ them but Darkman just made me cringe, especially the bit involving the manhole, the sound of a man screaming, heavy traffic and a REALLY bad dummy sticking out of said man hole...
Ted Raimi?
 

mickyboy

Well-Known Forumite
Gramaisc said:
Thre would appear to be a new version of Tales of the Riverbank out recently - but without real animals! What is the point of that? There are people involved who clearly should know better than to desecrate such a cultural icon. I might be getting the axe out again.
WHAT!!!!! i can't believe they used a puppet hammy the hamster and voiced him with Ardal o'Hanlon.

Maybe theyshould have got Richard Hammond to play the role !!!!!!!!!!!!!! no costume needed!!!!!!!!
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
mickyboy said:
Gramaisc said:
There would appear to be a new version of Tales of the Riverbank out recently - but without real animals! What is the point of that? There are people involved who clearly should know better than to desecrate such a cultural icon. I might be getting the axe out again.
WHAT!!!!! i can't believe they used a puppet hammy the hamster and voiced him with Ardal o'Hanlon.

Maybe theyshould have got Richard Hammond to play the role !!!!!!!!!!!!!! no costume needed!!!!!!!!
Don't watch that rubbish, here's the real thing. If they filmed this today the rat would have to be wearing goggles.
 
Top