Almost £5million cuts to care funding approved

joshua

Well-Known Forumite
http://www.staffordshirenewsletter.co.uk/almost-5million-cuts-to-care-funding-approved/story-29707266-detail/story.html


15459742-large.jpg

Almost £5million cuts to care funding approved


Comments (0)
ALMOST £5m in cuts to health and care services have been approved by Staffordshire County Council in an effort to help plug a £15m funding gap.

In June the Cabinet approved in principle a range of savings in a bid to help close the hole in the County Council's finances from the loss of anticipated income from the Better Care Fund (BCF).

At the time, members asked that more work be conducted to detail the impact the cuts would have on service users and the communities, so consultation was carried out.

A two-hour Corporate Review Committee meeting on Friday agreed cuts of £1.5m in 2016/17 and £3.7m in 2017/18 to: Carers' services; assistive technology, fixed equipment, adaptations and community equipment; the crisis support scheme; loneliness and isolation support services; direct payment support and non-statutory advocacy services.

County councillor Susan Woodward, who called in the suggested cuts, said she felt the proposals had not had proper scrutiny on the effect on service users and staff.

She told the committee: "We can see the impacts are going to be significant, particularly on the most vulnerable people in our community."

She added: "As far as the crisis support service is concerned, this is a service for those who find themselves in the most difficult position. People will often find themselves on hard times, these problems are often not self-inflicted and this is possibly the cruellest cut of all."

Councillor Woodward said 1,200 people will be affected directly by the cuts to services which help prevent loneliness and direct payments allow independence for people that need care.

She asked for the proposal to be deferred pending a review of advocacy services, but councillor Simon Tagg said the implementation plan covers working with providers already out there, without the expense the council can no longer afford.

One service affected by the cuts is Asist Advocacy Services, which has been helping people with learning disabilities to take part in consultation and speak up about decisions which affect them.

Cathy Jones, CEO, said: "As an organisation committed to ensuring that people with disabilities have a voice and a right to be heard, this is both a very sad situation, but also a missed opportunity to improve community engagement and understanding of the needs of people with disabilities.

"Overall feedback over the past couple of months about the possible loss of this service has ranged from extreme anger to a resigned acceptance as the people in these groups feel they are once again being disempowered and ignored."
 

tek-monkey

wanna see my snake?
And here's me thinking we're borrowing more than ever before so instead of cuts we'd get extra services, shows how much I know!

At least we can still nuke people!
 

proactive

Enjoying a drop of red.
And still they vote Conservative

And wonder

And complain

And then they go out and vote Conservative

Again

And

Again
Tell the twats who run Labour to get their heads out of their arses and start offering an alternative that people might actually vote for in sufficient numbers for things to change then.
 

kyoto49

Well-Known Forumite
Shameful. Having recently been exposed to the level of 'care' (and I use the word lightly) the council provide dementia suffers I'm glad the lady I knew that had dementia has now passed. The standard council provided care and co-ordination of that care was appalling at best. Lord only knows the suffering that will occur to the most vulnerable and needy in our society with another £5million of cuts. I'm genuinely saddened. Conservative voters must be so proud :(

Meanwhile:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...der-zhukov-uk-tax-arrangements-raise-concerns

Sickening times :(
 

tek-monkey

wanna see my snake?
Tell the twats who run Labour to get their heads out of their arses and start offering an alternative that people might actually vote for in sufficient numbers for things to change then.

I dunno, I'd vote for almost anyone that wasn't a Tory!
 

John Marwood

I ♥ cryptic crosswords
I'm not asking anyone to vote Labour


I'm just trying to figure out the people who repeatedly vote for a party who say they will cut public spending


Then go apeshit when public spending is cut

Then vote that party back in again

With a bigger majority

Insanity
 

Gareth

Well-Known Forumite
But again, doesn't this issue boil down to central government funding or lack of??

Haven't SCC just found out instead of receiving £16million from a certain pot of funding as promised they will receive only £2million.

my wifes friend who works for SCC claims emails going around regarding unions, redeployment and job cuts. Sounds like it's all hitting the fan again.
 

alphagamma

Well-Known Forumite
Newsletoff unable to find a photo of the CC building that didn't feature Heras fencing? Maybe it's part of the architecture?
 

Woody38

Active Member
Labour cut public services maybe not as much as tories but they do cut services, if they did not give so much to Scotland, Ireland & Wales, then when it comes to helping English people there's nothing left that might help.
 

alphagamma

Well-Known Forumite
But again, doesn't this issue boil down to central government funding or lack of??

Haven't SCC just found out instead of receiving £16million from a certain pot of funding as promised they will receive only £2million.

my wifes friend who works for SCC claims emails going around regarding unions, redeployment and job cuts. Sounds like it's all hitting the fan again.

Getting rid of the CEO would save £0.3m per year.
 

kyoto49

Well-Known Forumite
Labour cut public services maybe not as much as tories but they do cut services, if they did not give so much to Scotland, Ireland & Wales, then when it comes to helping English people there's nothing left that might help.

So why are neither party, when in government, increasing tax revenues by closing all the various loopholes used by the rich and powerful to avoid/evade tax..........................? It's not about English/Welsh/Scottish receiving tax revenues, it's about too many billionnaires and toffs avoiding paying what they rightfully should. they are morally bankrupt causing local councils to actually nearly be bankrupt.
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
So why are neither party, when in government, increasing tax revenues by closing all the various loopholes used by the rich and powerful to avoid/evade tax..........................? It's not about English/Welsh/Scottish receiving tax revenues, it's about too many billionnaires and toffs avoiding paying what they rightfully should. they are morally bankrupt causing local councils to actually nearly be bankrupt.
The Tories don't do it because they are their tax loopholes and stopping them would just be silly, Labour stopped doing anything about it because a lot of voters think that is a loony-left, anti-business policy and wouldn't vote for them, if they did.

Sad, really, but you're stuck with it for the foreseeable future.
 

John Marwood

I ♥ cryptic crosswords
I'm sure the fact that the BBC will no longer be showing Bake Off will generate more of a reaction




Vote Lard
 
Top