basil
don't mention the blinds
........blimey that was a long journey........Gramaisc said:
Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
........blimey that was a long journey........Gramaisc said:
Cracking point.....+1Miss Red said:The car is here....more people are here....fact! It has to be dealt with.And that would be? I would like to hear what you would do to ease the situation, other that buy a bike or get everyone to get on public transport! Im beginning to think you have shares in arriva!Yes it has to be dealt with, but not by building masses of new roads, because that solves nothing.
.I see you can pick endless faults with what people write on here, but never put forward a sound solution.
Your comments are being notedPeterD said:All I want is a policeman to park up with a camera on saturday morning by new look and take a picture, and charge all motorists that run a red light on the island and who sit in the yellow box.
1. Saving timegilesjuk said:Since my MOT ran out last week I've used my bike for everything again. I know what Henry's Cat is hinting at with "think of what it can do instead of can't".
I've been able to go straight into town first thing in the morning, collect a parcel from the Royal Mail depot, pop to ASDA and then to the business park for work.
I've also managed to go to ASDA straight from work and then home. All in a fraction of the time it would have taken in the car. There's plenty of shortcuts, cycle lanes and other ways of getting about in addition to the roads. You don't always have to go the same distance as you would in the car.
There's simply too many cars for the roads. You either need less cars or more roads and more roads attract more people in cars. Like Ben Elton said, it's like adding a second pedal bin in your kitchen. More capacity but it will fill up just like the other one did.
There's motorcycles, scooters and electric bikes. These can go past cars and queues. Cars are so big, which is fine when they're full of 5 people, but invariably they have one person in them (especially in my case as I'm the only person in my household).
Must be either very lucky or your route just isn't that bad. I commute to Stoke Monday to Friday and the mornings aren't too bad as I usually pass through about 7.20am but the evenings are just stupid unless I finish very early and hit Stafford before 4.30pm or leave it later until after about 6.30pm. I can get from Stoke to the junction of A34 & Beaconside in about 10mins and then it's between 25-45mins to do the last 4 miles (either through town and up Lichfield Rd or via beaconside and Baswich Lane.) And as for Saturdays... Lichfield Road is almost gridlocked.57mph said:my two penneth:-
i commute to Wolverhampton Monday to Friday five days a week, all the weeks of the year (exclude my holidays of course!) by car and the number of times i am caught in traffic fails insugnificantly to the times i am not, when there is a small delay it's really not a biggy, because that's what it is, a small delay and for a short period of time my nose is put out of joint yes but it really isn't worth getting me knickers in a twist, because the number of times i sail out of Stafford and back in again during peak time hours far out numbers the time i have traffic problems.
i don't have an 'easy' route either, i'm off the Westone Rd!
I completely agree, I've never imagined the mythical 'by-pass' to be an A500 affair with bridges, raised junctions etc. Simply extend Beaconside past the fire station to Cannock Rd and then through to J13 would do for now, if it was all 2 lane dual carriageway then great but even just a boggo main Road around the east of Stafford would be fantastic!57mph said:So, to hear that a bypass (much like Stokes effort) should be implemented to Stafford sounds plain bonkers to me.
You have heard, but haven't read evidently.Miss Red said:The car is here....more people are here....fact! It has to be dealt with.And that would be? I would like to hear what you would do to ease the situation, other that buy a bike or get everyone to get on public transport! Im beginning to think you have shares in arriva!Yes it has to be dealt with, but not by building masses of new roads, because that solves nothing.
.I see you can pick endless faults with what people write on here, but never put forward a sound solution.
This may become particularly obvious to any passers-by, should you go down the figure-hugging Lycra route..basil said:9. Increased fitness = increased libido .........
The driver is not in the "firing line" at all. If you compare the costs of driving to those of travelling by bus or rail, in real terms, since the 1960s then you'll see the only ones in the "firing line" are actually public transport users.Miss Red said:So basically put the car driver in the firing line, car drivers to pay to invest in public transport, we pay to invest in the roads but it dont happen!!
Make car drivers at fault if they hit a biker!! So all bikers are apt riders, no formal training, - well if ever that becomes law, lets hope that every bike rider undergoes rigerous training (at their own expense) a test (at their own expense) then when they have a piece of paper to say they are competent let them pay insurance too!!
In just the same way as their are crap car drivers - there are crap bikers too! But everything you say points to a utopia of bike riders!
But their again they are a tourist only area, not a commuter area!
To be quite honest, i really dont have time to "prove it" even if i wanted to! At the end of the day i have stated my "opinion" of a free speaking forum (aptly on veterans day).henryscat said:you still think it is, then prove it.
Ta for taking time to explain. At least I know what your vision is now! So, rather than revert to "build more roads", "rip down traffic lights", I'll be (try) and be constructive.henryscat said:As far as Stafford (and most towns) goes, there are a sufficient number of short distance trips being made by car that could easily switch to other means and relieve congestion. It is within the power of local people to address it by not driving, but they choose to continue to do so.
In an ideal world though...
There needs to be a level playing field between public transport and private car, which currently does not exist. The planning system also needs to be reformed.
I'd say the following needs to happen, but none of it is an overnight solution:
- national road pricing - proceeds to be invested in public transport
- restructure the rail network, preferably renationalising it instead of bonkers privatised structure we have now. Stop fares rises above inflation and preferably reduce fares.
- introduce London style regulation of the bus industry - i.e. control is taken away from operators of routes, timetables and fares .
- reform of the planning system, to concentrate development in more sensible locations - especially brown field sites in the conurbation.
- controls on out of town retail and supermarket developement, including charges for car parking.
- greater priority given to pedestrians and cyclists, including a strengthening of the law where vehicle / pedestrian or vehicle / cyclist accidents are concerned - preferably introducing the system that is adopted in other countries of if you hit a cyclist, the vehicle is assumed at fault unless there is evidence to the contrary.
The car will always be inefficient use of road space and it is completely insane to assume that it is ever possible to supply enough road space to allow for unrestrained demand for car travel. This was recognised decades back in the Buchanan report, in 1963, "Traffic in Towns" - and that was from a pro car point of view, written for a pro-car government. In case you think something written in 1963 is out of date, their car ownership forecasts 30 years ahead were astoundingly accurate.
Whilst you denounce bicycle and public transport as a solution - there isn't a large city on the planet that could function efficiently without.
So what's your solution? Other than "build some roads. Er, that's it".
The taxpayer subsidised the TOCs to the tune of £4.6bn last year - down from a peak of over £6bn in 2006/7, but well up from ~£1.5bn we gave them in 1999.phildo said:Restructure rail - Yes but not nationalise... we can have another thread if required but suffice to say the drain on public purse..not now.