tek-monkey
wanna see my snake?
How can you tell the private sector what to pay people? The whole point is they make money, if you take it off the workers then the owners get it instead. How is that good?
Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
Then the owners use what is now their extra money to create more jobs - so the trickle-down theory goes.How can you tell the private sector what to pay people? The whole point is they make money, if you take it off the workers then the owners get it instead. How is that good?
I haven't got much time for egotistical self centred 'because I'm worth it' bankers but how many have actually committed any crimes. Yes maybe the government should go knocking the doors who have trousered so many bonuses (and in hindsight the previous government should have nailed down the banks to much tighter governance before the state bailouts) but I find your equating bankers with rioters is the tired hand wringing language of the left
'Lets blame the bankers for everything' becoming a bit tiring and lacks any positive vision that is needed for the developed world to tackle it's chronic problems of massive debts, high spending and no growth.
This is turning into a good thread as it covers justice and peoples perceptions of justice.
With regards to bankers bonuses/excesses there is a strong feeling of injustice that many people are struggling and bumping along the bottom whilst those at the top are still creaming off the money.
This has been a running sore for the last 4 years and needs to tackled to move forward. How we do that I don't know, but maybe banning all bonuses until the economy has recovered would be a start.
The developed world has become flabby after so many good years and no one wants to lose the benifits and services that governments/councils provide, so therefore governments are borrowing amazing amounts of money to keep funding this spending. People are taxed excessivly already so only a return to growth will generate the extra taxes tofund the lifestyle that the west is used to.Those who brought down the banking system haven't been held accountable for their actions by and large. There similarly remains sometihng of a difference between how crimes such as tax evasion are perceived versus the sorts committed during rioting. I get a little bit irritated with the "lock everyone up and stop their benefits" attitude, because punishment by itself isn't going to solve anything. The causes need to be looked at too.
Lets not forget in a number of countries rioters are shot.
What struck me when the heavier sentances were handed down to people caught up in the riots was the shock in jail terms for first time offenders and percieved minor crimes. Surely the fact that taking part in one of the worst breakdowns of law and order in England merited punitive action. Don't forget that for 3 days parts of this country were under mob rule and only when the police stopped divering and got their act togeather did the riots stop. I think the courts made sure the message that rioting wouldn' be tolerated and rightly so.
Yes there are deep rooted social problems and more should be done to raise the asperatitions of people of the under class but there needs to be a deterrant as well.
The magnitude of what happened in the banking system is pretty mind boggling though and isn't something to be forgotten. I'm not convinced that sufficient lessons have been learned from it. What's happened in the developed world is a direct effect of insufficient regulation of a free market economy. Continued growth ad infinitum just isn't possible.... economic growth = more consumption of resources, but resources are finite - it doesn't go...
If not, statistically, morbidly obese.The developed world has become flabby ...
Quite a lot of money by all accounts....how much does the death penalty cost?Jail costs money, my benefit scalping idea saves it! I'd also make mandatory payments for maintenance direct from benefits too, but thats for another thread.
how much does the death penalty cost?
Interesting article here, claiming, amongst other things, that California has spent $4billion on it's capital punishment system since 1978 and only managed to kill 13 people in the same period...
how much does the death penalty cost?
We could just hang the lawyers...It should be cheap, but as G says the lawyers get it all. I'm all for the death penalty, once we get an infallible legal system.
Shame they are the private sector and therefore beyond the reach of all the cuts going on.
Ken Clarke said:We're not taking legal aid from women and children, we're taking legal aid from lawyers.
Taken from this article - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...arke-Legal-aid-cuts-are-aimed-at-lawyers.html - make of it what you will...Does that mean lawyers working for legal aid customers will get paid less, creating a sub-class of lawyers who can't get a real job?