Why do albums have different release dates around the world?

Miss Red

Well-Known Forumite
My daughter wants to know - why an album was released in the uk yesterday yet its been out in the usa for 16 months! I know someone governs or regulates music and movie releases in the uk and we have to wait a certain period of time before getting to see/hear them over here, but does anyone know the name of the people responsible please.





Admin edit: Amended thread title for clarity.
 

dangerousdave

Well-Known Forumite
the short answer is that whoever is releasing the album will not release it until it's the optimum time to release it in that area (for example the band in question may have a stronger following in north america so would release it there first, concentrate on there, and then expand once that market is geting towards the point of saturation)

you should also bear in mind that the record label or distributor in one country may not be the same as in another country, so they may not have had the contracts in place and signed in time to release it at the same time
 

tek-monkey

wanna see my snake?
Agreed, mad idea but to say you cannot legitimately own something but can illegally download it if you like seems to be the norm.
 

wmrcomputers

Stafford PC & laptop repair specialist
Miss Red said:
I know someone governs or regulates music and movie releases in the uk and we have to wait a certain period of time before getting to see/hear them over here, but does anyone know the name of the people responsible please.
It is this that caused so many DVD rips of movies oto be on sale in the UK several months before they even hit our cinema's, and as far as I believe this has started to be changed so that movies are released on the same time scale now in most countries.
 

Miss Red

Well-Known Forumite
thanks for ans that shes now more enlightened and has brought the cd that came out in the uk yesterday :)
Totally agree about the movies, it does encourage piracy and dont know why in this day and age, they still make us wait. A good example was the Tudors series on bbc2, the final series............usa had it aired first, then france and then ireland! Then they delayed it because of the althletics! it took 2 yrs for the bbc to finally get it shown over here!!!
The quicker they get us on the same level the better!
 

citricsquid

Well-Known Forumite
Specific to television and films, it's licensing. A company will produce the show and then license it out to as many people as possible. The BBC for example do not own all the shows they air. An excerpt from an online article that gives a quick overview:

TV networks don't own shows, we license them. The license lets us air the show in our territory for a certain number of years, spells out how many times per year we're allowed to run it, and how/if we're able to use it in other media. We license shows from TV studios that produce lots of series and hope to make money by licensing them in turn to lots of people. So, say a producer called BOING CO. makes an hour-long drama called BOING SHOW, and Syfy wants to license it. Because the U.S. has one of the bigger viewing populations out there, Syfy will probably pay a larger licensing fee than anyone else. Let's assume BOING SHOW costs $2 million per episode to produce, and Syfy's licensing fee for the U.S. is 50% of that, or $1 million. Included in that fee is the right for us to stream the show in U.S., since we're a U.S. based network. BOING CO. needs to make another $1 million in licensing fees just to break even, so they shop BOING SHOW to other countries. In the U.K., the BBC wants to license the show. Since they have a smaller audience than Syfy, their licensing fee is smaller, let's say $250,000. For that fee the BBC wants the rights to stream the show in the U.K., so that's part of the deal. BOING CO. will go out and repeat this process in as many territories as it can, trying to recoup the $2 million it's spending on each episode. Two particularly interesting things usually happen in the TV business model at this point.
From: http://boingboing.net/2010/05/04/tv-economics-101-why.html
 

Excursion

A few posts under my belt
to give them time to distribute it on the internet for free so when it does come out the artist gets nothing
 

dangerousdave

Well-Known Forumite
Excursion said:
to give them time to distribute it on the internet for free so when it does come out the artist gets nothing
i'm sorry mate but that makes no sense whatsoever. why would a record label who have paid for distribution, press teams, advertising, the recording mixing and mastering of the recording, as well as any advance to the artist and many other costs wish to distribute it for free on the internet?

record labels do have anough ways of shafting artists as it is, but they're not likely to shaft themselves
 
Top