andy w said:
Withnail said:
andy w said:
Is not the guardian going to defend critizism of the progressive train of thought that wants to nulify christmas.
As you say there was controversy back in the 90s where all public bodies decided it wasn't right to mention christmas. It was obvious that they didn't want to offend any minoritees even though the vast majority had no problems with Christmas and took no offence.
But isn't that the agenda on the left to cause divisions within this country
Just for keepsies.
"Is not the guardian going to defend critizism of the progressive train of thought that wants to nulify christmas."
Tee hee - i do likes a bit of nonsense i does.
I forgot theres only one person allowed to talk bollox on here
Let's just break those bollocks down -
a)"Is not the guardian going to defend critizism of the progressive train of thought that wants to nulify christmas"
Quite apart from the typos, this sentence makes almost no sense at all. And you would have to remove the word 'almost' from the previous sentence to make the previous sentence make any sense at all.
b)"As you say"
That's not what he said at all, in fact quite the contrary.
c)"there was controversy back in the 90s where all public bodies decided it wasn't right to mention christmas"
That's just it, they didn't. Birmingham tried to save a bit of money on the marketing front by rolling all their 'seasonal' events into one promotion - putting the 'winter' of Winter together with the 'val' of Festi
val to create 'Winterval'. Rather than 'all' public bodies deciding anything,
none followed suit.
d)"It was obvious that they didn't want to offend any minoritees even though the vast majority had no problems with Christmas and took no offence"
Christmas was named as 'Christmas' as part of the 'Winterval' calendar of events - it is obvious that you have not taken any time to see that that was the case. Hopefully more people will take this piece of information on board, so that the vast majority of people, who have been misinformed into thinking this episode was in any way connected with not wishing to cause offence, will find themselves in the minoritee.
e)"But isn't that the agenda on the left to cause divisions within this country"
Traditionally it has been the agenda of the left to end division within this country. On the whole it has been the agenda of the right to
maintain divisions within this country.
But as phildo so accurately points out,
phildo said:
Ah, but in the modern game the right and left wingers frequently switch wings to mix things up a bit and test the full backs...