Coronavirus.

proactive

Enjoying a drop of red.
@Lucy Terrible, im not sure how i can be coughing less, but feel worse.

The app said I was no longer infectious this morning, and i could go out......but my test was posative again, so it now suggests one more day of isolation.

Fortunatly....the carer has much milder symptoms, so has been doing all the cooking, although we now think minime has it again.....

🙄🙄🙄🙄
Just ignore the app. It's bloody useless. Go by how you feel and by when you test negative. You're an individual not a statistic and the app can't cope with that.

I hope you both feel better very soon.
 

Theresa Green

Well-Known Forumite
@Lucy Terrible, im not sure how i can be coughing less, but feel worse.

The app said I was no longer infectious this morning, and i could go out......but my test was posative again, so it now suggests one more day of isolation.

Fortunatly....the carer has much milder symptoms, so has been doing all the cooking, although we now think minime has it again.....

🙄🙄🙄🙄
Blimey

Crikey
 
Last edited:

EasMid

Well-Known Forumite
From Wolsnet’s tweet posted earlier.
“Retweet if you want to know if Sunak, a PM none voted for, has conflicts of interest with big pharma.”
The only people that voted for Sunak were his constituents.
When will “wolsnet” & the like understand that the U.K. doesn’t elect a prime minister, We elect our local MP & hope their party gets a majority. 🙄🙄🤦‍♂️
 

Cue

Well-Known Forumite
From Wolsnet’s tweet posted earlier.
“Retweet if you want to know if Sunak, a PM none voted for, has conflicts of interest with big pharma.”
The only people that voted for Sunak were his constituents.
When will “wolsnet” & the like understand that the U.K. doesn’t elect a prime minister, We elect our local MP & hope their party gets a majority. 🙄🙄🤦‍♂️
Let’s be real though, we absolutely vote based on the PM.

To say otherwise is just pure denial. It doesn’t matter what the intention of the system is.
 

SketchyMagpie

Well-Known Forumite
I hope you remember that more people have had serious reactions or died from the treatment, restrictions and after effects than any other health crisis in history!
Do you have a source for this claim?

I really don't know why I'm asking considering that yesterday we established that you don't even agree with things that you yourself post but there ya go.

If this has any bearing in reality I'd imagine that a) it is referring to "modern history" and discounting plagues of the distant past and b) it is counting in raw numbers rather than percentages, which would appear bigger than any other crisis because this has been the biggest in living memory but the actual percentages would be within the expected range.
 
Last edited:

Theresa Green

Well-Known Forumite
"This will be over in 3 months!" Remember that?
Since then, what? A list of lockdowns, endless law changes and rights stripped away - all for our own good? To protect us from a deadly virus that most people survive from? If your answer to this is justified by "but people have died", I hope you remember that more people have had serious reactions or died from the treatment, restrictions and after effects than any other health crisis in history!
And now a 10 year deal where a company set up by those including our new PM has invested £500M and if that doesn't have you asking questions, the jabs really did get you!
The Bubonic Plague of 1346 was more of a sniffle I expect ?

Hot pokers all round!

Q Why do the media call Conservative leaders by their first name but any other party leader by their last name?

A Because all Conservatives are just so cute

((((( cuddles ))))
 

tek-monkey

wanna see my snake?
Let’s be real though, we absolutely vote based on the PM.

To say otherwise is just pure denial. It doesn’t matter what the intention of the system is.
I'd go one further and say we actively vote against a PM/party rather than for one. I'd probably vote green, but they'd never get in so I vote red in the hope of getting rid of blue (still not forgiven yellow).
 

Mudgie

Well-Known Forumite
From Wolsnet’s tweet posted earlier.
“Retweet if you want to know if Sunak, a PM none voted for, has conflicts of interest with big pharma.”
The only people that voted for Sunak were his constituents.
When will “wolsnet” & the like understand that the U.K. doesn’t elect a prime minister, We elect our local MP & hope their party gets a majority. 🙄🙄🤦‍♂️
The only people that voted for Sunak were his constituents - neatly two-thirds of them, 36,683
I'd go one further and say we actively vote against a PM/party rather than for one. I'd probably vote green, but they'd never get in so I vote red in the hope of getting rid of blue (still not forgiven yellow).
Yes, actively voting against rather than for is what I've usually done, and more so next time than ever.
 
Last edited:

rudie111

Well-Known Forumite
"This will be over in 3 months!" Remember that?
Since then, what? A list of lockdowns, endless law changes and rights stripped away - all for our own good? To protect us from a deadly virus that most people survive from? If your answer to this is justified by "but people have died", I hope you remember that more people have had serious reactions or died from the treatment, restrictions and after effects than any other health crisis in history!
And now a 10 year deal where a company set up by those including our new PM has invested £500M and if that doesn't have you asking questions, the jabs really did get you!
I remember someone saying our immune systems would basically give up in three month. Can’t quite remember who said that though.
 

littleme

250,000th poster!
Finally a negative, even though I feel like death warmed up...

20221230_184832.jpg
 
Top