Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
I seem to recall same when my little soldier worked there too.When I worked at the warehouse many years back it was 3 shifts of 8 hours, starting at 6am/2pm/10pm.
Exactly correct, I did those shifts for 10 years.When I worked at the warehouse many years back it was 3 shifts of 8 hours, starting at 6am/2pm/10pm.
Looking at the drawing, the bridge is unaffected - the proposed right turn markings for Gravel Lane and the development are all off the bridge. It is still a hideously stupid proposal for a junction though.I agree with you henryscat that it is the junction, rather than the amount of traffic likely to be generated, that is the most important consideration.
I'm surprised Network Rail have agreed to it. They are usually very precious about their bridges.
It would be worthwhile some body speaking to network rail to see if anything has been discussed with them and what their view is of the proposed modifications to the bridge.
True, but thats just the warehouse shift pattern. The Argos site also hosts a customer contact centre, which now has operates on flexible shifts (based on forecasted call volumes) as well as back office and support functions.I seem to recall same when my little soldier worked there too.
Just for information Argos site isn't in SBC but is in South Staffordshire.I would expect Argos (and Stone Computers) to have a travel plan co-ordinator. The purpose of their role is to encourage the employers to car share or bike to work etc. They should also monitor travel to work arrangements. This should be done an annual basis, however I suspect this is probably wishful thinking.
As part of the planning application for Argos and Stone Computers a Travel Plan should have been submitted to SBC. SBC will also have a travel plan co-ordinator who should liaise regularly with their the employment operator to ensure that the travel plan is being adhered to. Within the Travel Plan they should have targets for the number of employees car sharing, cycling to work etc. In addition to this, it should also state how they propose to monitor travel to work arrangements and encourage more sustainable travel.
So in answer to your question Dlady, I would recommend that you review the Travel Plan that was submitted to the Council when the applications were submitted and find out who the travel plan co-ordinator is at Argos (and Stone Computers) and at SBC. The travel plan coordinators should be able to answer your question. If they are not able to, then they are not doing their job properly.
I don't know anybody that works at Argos, however I would suspect that they would have two shifts patterns; day and night shift. As such, they will be travelling to work at off peak times. Only the office staff will be travelling to and from work during peak travel times. Because I suspect Argos will have two shifts, which are likely to start early in the morning (6am) and finish late at night (10pm), I suspect very few shift workers would cycle to and from work. In light of this, you should also look at how many workers travel to work by public transport. This is likely to be a popular choice of transport because there is a bus stop nearby.
Finally, I assume your undertaking this research in order to fight the appeal at Ash Flats. In order for an Inspector to dismiss an appeal they must be of the opinion that the traffic impact of allowing the development would be significant.
Hope that helps.
Blimey, when i saw that you'd replied to the thread i wasn't sure what shocked me more - that you might actually work at Argos, or that you might actually cycle to work.
Thankfully it is neither, normality resumed.
Nice legs ................
My bike is in the shed - nice and safe!Blimey, when i saw that you'd replied to the thread i wasn't sure what shocked me more - that you might actually work at Argos, or that you might actually cycle to work.
Thankfully it is neither, normality resumed.