Yes it is.
At least i have found it to be so. In the absence of further witnesses, it would appear that you lose 2:1.
If you can muster sufficient grounds you could take your case to the Court of Appeal.
Given that you have taken the time, and expended the effort, to 'post' on the aforementioned
www.staffordforum.com a 'post' that disavows its addictive nature, the Defense contends that were it not so, the plaintiff would have been otherwise willing to 'Let it Lie'*.
It is the view of the Defense that the very act of 'posting' an opinion on the 'addictive' nature of the forum, however derogatory it may be assumed to be, is a
de facto acknowledgement of the very same 'addictive' qualities of the forum that the plaintiff disavows.
*
Reeves v. Mortimer 19ninetysomething