Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
Do you think they care?Are you watching?
Are you watching?
Are you watching, SBC?
Are you watching, SBC?
My arse do they.Do you think SBC now understand the benefits of sport / fitness and the need to retain and enhance sporting facilities?
Do you think SBC now understand the benefits of sport / fitness and the need to retain and enhance sporting facilities?
I wonder if the same rules apply here get the leisure chief to become a director then he gets all the funding in grants , scuppers any other attempt what remuneration is he getting ? surely the same type of thing that Big Sam was doing ? Abuse of position ?Only if it's rugby and cost several million quid
Document ID 2089421 gives a good summaryWhy did the planning application get refused? Was it refused by members? Was it also recommended for refusal by officers?
I have no idea why this application was refused. I wish the planning appeal every success. I hope they go for costs as well.
All of the above!!!Either she's ignorant, mis-informed, badly briefed or lied to by her own organisation
.
Olympic standard ignorance. Give her her due, she must have worked at it for decades.she's ignorant
you should drop her an email.....I was going to comment on her (C Baron) quote when I posted the picture of the article. But I couldn't think of a way to accurately explain how I feel about the level of incompetence the comments demonstrate.
Mr. Hill is no more - Stafford's loss is Bristol's gain.... get the leisure chief to become a director...
Is this true still showing on SBC website as head of leisureMr. Hill is no more - Stafford's loss is Bristol's gain.
A fúck I do not give.Is this true still showing on SBC website as head of leisure
A fúck I do not give.
They're all crooks. Only the name is different.