tek-monkey
wanna see my snake?
Perhaps someone should tell them to appeal, with the 152% increase used as a comparable extension.
Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
The Freedom Of Information Act is to be reviewed by a panel of people who are probably rather less interested in it actually working than we are.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33580800
Including Jack Straw on it is presumably a joke intended to cheer us up.
It's the only pic they have on file and they can't afford to send anyone to take a new one, is the more likely scenario.Funny how the E&S use a picture of Stafford Place surrounded by fencing, as though that's part of the buildings.
About as likely as the Snoozletter dong an in-depth under-cover instigation into Heanan.I think they're making a point,
Who?For the 100th time HE SAID SORRY!!!
Is an apology not enough? Do you actually want this man to do some bird?
Mr Heenan. He just forgot to declare his interests and probably made a little bit of money that arrived in a non white envelope but he said sorry.Who?
Never heard of him.Mr Heenan. He just forgot to declare his interests and probably made a little bit of money that arrived in a non white envelope but he said sorry.
Mr Heenan. He just forgot to declare his interests and probably made a little bit of money that arrived in a non white envelope but he said sorry.
Yes but, apart from that everything is above board.Process:
There was no pre-application consultation
The application is a moving target because of continual amendments
The application was advertised with a misleading site address; there was a lack of publicity
The applicant was advised that no more amendments would be accepted then more information was submitted
There has not been sufficient time for late amendments to be viewed by consultees
The process has not been transparent
Supporting comments from people outside of Stafford should be disregarded
References to the previous approval are irrelevant and should be ignored
External influences such as the Newsletter stating new courses from this site suggest the decision has already been made
The height of the clubhouse is not clear
Network Rail were not informed but there is an impact on rail users
Senior SBC officer who is also a SRC Director is party to information on the application
The club have links with Adam Hill and Mike Heenan
Council officers have been lodging support online
Land charge searches on the housing estate did not reveal previous applications on this site
If approved, the case will need to be judicially reviewed
Also (a classic, this one)
The club have no legal right to build over protected green space