Raised crossing in earl street

henryscat

Well-Known Forumite
I likewise heard the same, on good authority. The new hump is actually just as high, but less humpy if you catch my drift.

Guess a more gentle profile. Presumably it has to be the same height because that's determined by the kerb, unless the pavement is modified.
 

shoes

Well-Known Forumite
Translation: you have chosen to drive a heavily modified car for a niche application. 99.9% of people drive a motor car that is set up for every day driving. If driving your modified car away from a track really does do that to it, then you have a couple of choices - trailer it to the track using one of your fleet of BMWs, or be selective where you drive it. As you might guess I haven't really any sympathy. If you can afford to be racing about in a car, you can afford to laser align suspension every third phase of the moon and optimise the flux capacitor for performance above 88 mph. You've chosen to drive a very non-standard car so you must also choose to live with the consequences. The majority of the rest of us drive normal cars so don't have a problem, and as per Stafford Forum rules, the majority is always right innit?
Read my post again, decipher sarcasm.

My road car, which I drive everywhere, get's knocked about something chronic by speedhumps.

My track car which I no longer drive over speedhumps but driver harder in general was barely off the settings it had three months ago.

Not too fussed whether or not you have any sympathy, the fact of the matter is that cars designed for relatively flat surfaces are knocked about and misaligned by gigantic lumps of tarmac, concrete...whatever, placed in the road by the council to justify their own existence.

I can't tow a three series with another three series as you well know. Despite serious weight reduction, the weight of the car plus a trailer simply makes this a silly thing to do, and rightfully so, illegal.

As for VOSA I must admit I didn't know you had to stop for them. Lucky I did when they last attempted to pull me over then eh?
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
As for VOSA I must admit I didn't know you had to stop for them. Lucky I did when they last attempted to pull me over then eh?
I believe that it used to be that they could only stop you in areas where they had been accredited by the appropriate Police force, Staffordshire being one such area. Maybe it's everywhere now..?
 

henryscat

Well-Known Forumite
Read my post again, decipher sarcasm.

I speak a different dialect of sarcasm....

I can't tow a three series with another three series as you well know. Despite serious weight reduction, the weight of the car plus a trailer simply makes this a silly thing to do, and rightfully so, illegal.

Easy, buy a 4x4 then you can never fear a speed hump again and tow massive trailer.....

As for VOSA I must admit I didn't know you had to stop for them. Lucky I did when they last attempted to pull me over then eh?

Yep, they are warranted with powers to stop.
 

henryscat

Well-Known Forumite
I believe that it used to be that they could only stop you in areas where they had been accredited by the appropriate Police force, Staffordshire being one such area. Maybe it's everywhere now..?

My understanding is that some (but not all) of it is with police accreditation. All VOSA officers should carry warrant cards which I think detail what authorisation they have.
 

Mikinton

Well-Known Forumite
It broke on the speed hump. If the speed humps weren't there it wouldn't have broke on them.
You're aware of the phrase "The straw that broke the camel's back", maybe? Maybe down to all those times you parked on pavements, if you're anything like other 4x4 drivers. (They think that's what 'off road vehicle' is referring to.)
 

Jonah

Spouting nonsense since the day I learned to talk
You're aware of the phrase "The straw that broke the camel's back", maybe? Maybe down to all those times you parked on pavements, if you're anything like other 4x4 drivers. (They think that's what 'off road vehicle' is referring to.)

Stupid idiotic comment.

I park properly. The spring broke on the speed hump and it has nothing to do with parking.
 

shoes

Well-Known Forumite
That doesn't mean that speed humps caused the breakage.
What an excellent defence.

Yes your honour, it may appear that I kicked that man in the face, however it doesn't mean it was my boot which caused his teeth to become detached.
 

db

#chaplife
Translation: :blah: ...and as per Stafford Forum rules, the majority is always right innit?

Translation: not that i'm bitter about the fact no-one ever agrees with me or anything.. honest.. no, really.. here, observe as i mount my verbose defence about something i don't care about.. LOOK, I'M NOT BITTER, OK :angry:
 

Gareth

Well-Known Forumite
Reasons car go bust on speed humps:

-poor workmanship and crappy parts, original or otherwise
-constantly bouncing over speed humps, as stated then there is one hump to break the camels back.
-Hitting a speed hump way to first.

It is amazing how many people complain about speed humps but the speed I see some going over them it is no great surprise cars get damaged. The amount of times I have gone down a road on my own with speed humps to then look up and there is a car on my tail, how fast do some people go over these things. So many drivers think they are not going that fast but they are, in 20 years plus of driving and umpteen cars of varying stanard I have never damaged my car as I treat humps with the respect for the reason they are put there for and of course my own car.

I find it almost hilarious how modern 4x4s can be damaged in such a way, even when they are supposed to tackle and handle tough terrain. What does that tell people:lolsmash:

Of course this doesn't go for everyone but if cars kept to the limit in key pedastrian areas, they wouldn't be required.
 
Top