John Marwood
I ♥ cryptic crosswords
Never argue with an idiot
Life is just too short
Life is just too short
Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
I am not deluded, I do get it, there's no need to feel sorry for me.....I sleep easily at night. I am or will be proud of the excellent community sports facility when it is built.....which will see hundreds of children running around, playing every Sunday.
Are you angry with all the houses being built in the area, wind turbines going up, the ever expanding business parks at the north of the town, increased development of the MOD camp......or do you just reserve your anger for a sports club being relocated by its landlord?
I appreciate that a number of people are against the site, yourself included but do you not think that there are a lot of people that strongly support it?
Er, I'm not a neighbour! And your fence was always in your plans so don't try and lie and say it is because you have angry neighbours. You only gained angry neighbours through your disregard for anyone or anything other than yourselves.........
I assume you're being deliberately obtuse?? Kids don't need to actually be on the site to benefit. The betterment of our natural world benefits us all directly and indirectly. Having said that maybe you should open your eyes, as I've seen kids regulalry building dens in those hedges and playing in those fields over the long summer holidays.........
Nice that you fail to answer my other statements and questions. I can only take your silence as vindication that I'm correct.
Will the site moderator be changing WoolmanT to MAL?
I feel a little sorry for WoolmanT / stafford rugby club. He can't be held accountable for sbc allocating part of the former rugby land for a housing allocation and, therefore, making them homeless. He also can't be blamed because the landowner (lord stafford) wants to sell his land to a developer to make him even richer. I also don't see how WoolmanT can be blamed for the underhand / devious / corrupt / incomprehensible decision by sbc to refuse the hockey club application.
I don't like the new location of the rugby club. However, the site is available, suitable and deliverable etc and I know from 1st hand experience how useless sbc are in assisting existing sports club relocate. I've held meetings with sbc about relocating a very succesful sports club to beaconside and was basically told to f*ck off, as such whilst I believe beaconside could have been a fantastic sports complex for a number of sports, as well as a great community asset, our council are too stupid / incompetent to make this a reality.
People's anger should be directed towards Adam Hill; Ted Manders and sbc.
.[/QUOTE said:Not much sympathy here for Woolmal if he has any involvement with council employees also acting as directors of private companies.
re, growing a pair, I've observed that retired rugby players tend to put on a lot of weight and grow a pair of something else, i.e. moobs.
Hope nature takes it back and no doubt it will with the amount of water in that area.
Just hope when the rugby club gets going they do a far better clearing up after their 50 or so supporters after. Because it is left to the residence of castlefieldd currently.
Hope nature takes it back and no doubt it will with the amount of water in that area.
Just hope when the rugby club gets going they do a far better clearing up after their 50 or so supporters after. Because it is left to the residence of castlefieldd currently.
Nature will always win out and with all the building on the flood plain the chances of the whole place becoming a swamp is something I look forward too with glee.....karma and all that.
At least the big fence will contain their rubbish if not their light pollution and traffic
I don't currently have a shotgun licence by the way
Just in case anyone gets a sting on the arse cheeks . It wanna me
Royt?
Would the players or floodlights be first up......if you did happen to have a shotgun licence?!
Royt? Fine with me