Stafford shops closing - Turning into a ghost town?

markpa12003

Well-Known Forumite
Seems the public via social media do not share that view. Yes to the development, but it should have been built in the north of the town.

Where? How? The Sheridan Centre?

Building the Riverside Development in the north end of town would have involved acquiring 3rd party properties and redeveloping the whole area. Whilst I'd support this, it was never going to happen given that there was large, derelict site to the south of the town.

I'm very glad we have the riverside development. Hopefully, the morons managing the Guildhall will now finally address it's decline.
 

Steve_b

Well-Known Forumite
Where? How? The Sheridan Centre?

Building the Riverside Development in the north end of town would have involved acquiring 3rd party properties and redeveloping the whole area. Whilst I'd support this, it was never going to happen given that there was large, derelict site to the south of the town.

I'm very glad we have the riverside development. Hopefully, the morons managing the Guildhall will now finally address it's decline.
Perhaps the local land owners who objected to the development wanted to off load there assets?
 
Last edited:

Jonah

Spouting nonsense since the day I learned to talk
The Guildhall was supposed to revitalise the town centre and it did for a while. It doesn't seem too long ago since it was completely fully occupied (although in reality it could be a decade ago). It used to be a very vibrant place when it was full.

What's happened to Stafford has happened in many towns. The credit crunch recession has hit Stafford very hard, big chains have gone bust leaving empty shops in their wake and other chains have seen the benefit of 'out of town' retail parks with (I'm assuming) lower rents and free car parking which attracts customers. Stafford is going to take a long time to recover from the last recession. It's already almost a decade since it first started and I think it's could be another before it gets past its effect.

Town centre shopping will never be what it used to be. Retail shopping is fragmented now into town centres, out of town retail parks, and internet shopping. The sooner people realise this the better.
 

HopesDad

Don't feed the troll
Where? How? The Sheridan Centre?

Building the Riverside Development in the north end of town would have involved acquiring 3rd party properties and redeveloping the whole area. Whilst I'd support this, it was never going to happen given that there was large, derelict site to the south of the town.

I'm very glad we have the riverside development. Hopefully, the morons managing the Guildhall will now finally address it's decline.
Errrr... it wasn't a large derelict site until it was turned into one. The area housed a leisure Centre that had more facilities than the one that replaced it, a supermarket in relatively new buildings and a mult-storey car park very similar to the one that replaced it. There was no need to knock any of it down.
 
Last edited:

EasMid

Well-Known Forumite
Where? How? The Sheridan Centre?

Building the Riverside Development in the north end of town would have involved acquiring 3rd party properties and redeveloping the whole area. Whilst I'd support this, it was never going to happen given that there was large, derelict site to the south of the town.

I'm very glad we have the riverside development. Hopefully, the morons managing the Guildhall will now finally address it's decline.
There's plenty of free land available on Chell Road. The outside lane signposted Telford seems to be an unpopular parcel of land that certain people don't think anyone should use.
 

markpa12003

Well-Known Forumite
Errrr... it wasn't a large derelict site until it was turned into one. The area housed a leisure Centre that had more facilities than the one that replaced it, a supermarket in relatively new buildings and a mult-storey car park very similar to the one that replaced it. There was no need to knock any of it down.

The former site comprised of a council owned leisure centre that was ugly and a large council owned car park. It's a lot easier to redevelop an area when you own the asset that you are wanting to develop. The new leisure centre is far better than the one it replaced and the riverside complex is far more attractive than what it replaced.
 

HopesDad

Don't feed the troll
The former site comprised of a council owned leisure centre that was ugly and a large council owned car park. It's a lot easier to redevelop an area when you own the asset that you are wanting to develop. The new leisure centre is far better than the one it replaced and the riverside complex is far more attractive than what it replaced.
So, as I said, they replaced the ugly leisure Centre with another ugly leisure Centre but with many fewer facilities, they replaced a large council-owned car park with another council-owned car park. They replaced a large empty supermarket with an even larger empty supermarket.
The riverside complex would have been just as attractive, if that is what you think it is, wherever it was built. Had it been built on the council-owned site on which the supermarket-that-never-was was built then Stafford would have had exactly the same facilities as it does now, at considerably less cost, and without the creation of a wasteland at the northern end of the former shopping area.
But that would have required some planning, and Stafford council has a policy of not planning anything, as we all know to our cost.
 
Last edited:

andy w

Well-Known Forumite
I read just recently how so many stores have closed or going to close in America. The article acknowledged that the UK seen it's share of closures such as BHS but was behind the curve in store closures and expected many more. It predicted that town centres would hollow out and there would just not be the demand for retail space.
The worry is that the investment companies that own many of the freeholds will just leave them empty and not reduce the rents to attract tenants or convert them for alternative uses (as is the case in Stafford with some shops being empty for over 5 years).
I would imagine that sometime in the future the politicians will acknowledge the decline in shop based retailing and it's effect on town centres and come up with plans to rejuvenate them (encourage more housing in town centres and give councils the ability to compulsory purchase shops that have been empty for a long time for example) but I won't hold my breath.
 

basil

don't mention the blinds
So, as I said, they replaced the ugly leisure Centre with another ugly leisure Centre but with many fewer facilities, they replaced a large council-owned car park with another council-owned car park. They replaced a large empty supermarket with an even larger empty supermarket.
The riverside complex would have been just as attractive, if that is what you think it is, wherever it was built. Had it been built on the council-owned site on which the supermarket-that-never-was was built then Stafford would have had exactly the same facilities as it does now, at considerably less cost, and without the creation of a wasteland at the northern end of the former shopping area.
But that would have required some planning, and Stafford council has a policy of not planning anything, as we all know to our cost.

Zzz Zzz.....
 

Cue

Well-Known Forumite
Maybe I haven't been in Stafford long enough, but I always knew the location of the development to be a derelict bunch of tarmac, an old grey car park looking structure and a bridge over the river, and that was it.

Was there something else there before? I never really even paid it any attention (maybe that was the problem?)
 

kyoto49

Well-Known Forumite
The former site comprised of a council owned leisure centre that was ugly and a large council owned car park. It's a lot easier to redevelop an area when you own the asset that you are wanting to develop. The new leisure centre is far better than the one it replaced and the riverside complex is far more attractive than what it replaced.

Behave :( The old leisure centre was far bigger, and had it been maintained and updated correctly it would still be an asset to the town. It had both a large pool AND a diving pool, it had more squash courts, more sports halls, space for table tennis on the upstairs corridors etc etc. Back in the day kids would spend their whole summer holidays doing sport at the Riverside for 4 hours a day. No kid does sport at the new place in the holidays anymore because it's just a glorified adult gym with a pool that any peado can sit over the road to view. At a time when Stafford is multiplying in size, the council decided to make a fast buck and lumber the people of Stafford with a facility half the size of the centre that was built 40 years earlier when the population was significantly smaller. It might have been shiny and new, but it's to sports facilites what the guildhall is to shopping.............sh*t!
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
Maybe I haven't been in Stafford long enough, but I always knew the location of the development to be a derelict bunch of tarmac, an old grey car park looking structure and a bridge over the river, and that was it.

Was there something else there before? I never really even paid it any attention (maybe that was the problem?)
There was a multi-storey carpark, of a similar size (which was miraculously found to be unsafe), a Tesco store about the same size as the current Tesco, and a sports centre that was built around 1976.

It feels a bit odd when you see buildings that you saw built being demolished...
 

proactive

Enjoying a drop of red.
There was a multi-storey carpark, of a similar size (which was miraculously found to be unsafe), a Tesco store about the same size as the current Tesco, and a sports centre that was built around 1976.
To be fair it suffered quite badly from urine corrosion.
 

Mikinton

Well-Known Forumite
Behave :( The old leisure centre was far bigger, and had it been maintained and updated correctly it would still be an asset to the town. It had both a large pool AND a diving pool, it had more squash courts, more sports halls, space for table tennis on the upstairs corridors etc etc. Back in the day kids would spend their whole summer holidays doing sport at the Riverside for 4 hours a day. No kid does sport at the new place in the holidays anymore because it's just a glorified adult gym with a pool that any peado can sit over the road to view. At a time when Stafford is multiplying in size, the council decided to make a fast buck and lumber the people of Stafford with a facility half the size of the centre that was built 40 years earlier when the population was significantly smaller. It might have been shiny and new, but it's to sports facilites what the guildhall is to shopping.............sh*t!
And the new location is worse as well.

I used to work for County Treasurers and reckon I must have played around 1000 5-a-side games in the old Riverside, due in part because it was convenient to play during lunch hours and after work. When the new one opened, our 5-a-side squad folded as did others.
 

Cue

Well-Known Forumite
There was a multi-storey carpark, of a similar size (which was miraculously found to be unsafe), a Tesco store about the same size as the current Tesco, and a sports centre that was built around 1976.

It feels a bit odd when you see buildings that you saw built being demolished...

I see. When did that all disappear? Definitely don't remember a Tesco.

We had a similar build appear back down south before I moved. Same circumstances too I believe... started knocking things down (old GP and a car park I believe), then they forgot it was there for a bit and suddenly it all appeared overnight (well, over a semester maybe). Though that had a lot more empty space to eat at and they added a Morrison's, bunch of eateries and a Travel Lodge. Bit more going for it than the 5 or so shops and eateries filling not much of the new development
 
Last edited:

John Marwood

I ♥ cryptic crosswords
And the new location is worse as well.

I used to work for County Treasurers and reckon I must have played around 1000 5-a-side games in the old Riverside, due in part because it was convenient to play during lunch hours and after work. When the new one opened, our 5-a-side squad folded as did others.

BREXIT!
 
Top