kyoto49
Well-Known Forumite
That because nowadays there are no or few worthwhile schemes on offer for kids, there is no funding for it.
If there was, take up still wouldn't be good because today's kids ( not all) want something different to kids 15- 20 years ago etc. We never had the online and software accesses they do today, most won't leave their rooms now.
Back in the day we couldn't wait to get out and do something
No, the council is too busy wasteing it's money removing graffiti - see my point now? I'd argue that the money spent removing graffiti would be far better spent on holiday sport schemes that not only keep kids entertained but have a positive benefit on health whcih subsequently helps reduce NHS spend as well. I disagree though that it's all about funding. That new place has 1 sports hall, kind of limits any attempt to provide proper sport. roller skating is out, and if you have 5-a side then the hall can't then be used for trampoling and badminton and gymnastics and table tennis. In short, the place is the most retrograde short-sighted bit of fine work by our despicable planners whose only interest in money, not the residents, and yes, I objected and wrote letters to anyone who would listen to oppose the plans at the time. Finally, kids still love sport, ask all those parents who schlep their kids to sports club after sports club every evening, and I'm one of them!