Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
I would think that should read should not rather than cannot.
Officially sacked for "swearing in a meeting" - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18639088 - then paid half a million pounds of public money to drop a case of unfair dismissal and keep his mouth shut about that, and anything else that went on."The law is clear any clause in a settlement or compromise agreement is void in so far as it purports to preclude a worker from making a protected disclosure - section 43J Employment Rights Act 1996. But if such a clause cannot legally be used to prevent a person from whistleblowing, no doubt some who have been offered, or accepted compromise agreements containing one have felt gagged. "
Probably not - in the sense that they are paying for silence over issues that they can pay for silence over - and any additional silence that might happen is just their 'good luck', m'Lud.So is the council breaking the law?
Here's £500 now be a good chap and put this gag onSo is the council breaking the law?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/foi/wondered if BBC were bound by freedom of information requests.