I'm a bit confused now as their are three threads currently covering similar ground.
I wanted to respond in particular to Zylo and skwalker1964, firstly for the 'happy now' sort of statement, and secondly for the 'yes, i did mean if' sort of thing.
I'm putting it here because i think there has been a strange polarisation type affair going on, that seems to make absurd distinctions between people being 'for' or 'against' the hospital. Whether 'for' or 'against' has been framed in a discourse that has depended in part on whether they think that it has been a 'car crash' or not, or if it once was a 'car crash' but is now not. Added to this mix is a new idea that it is, in fact, some figment of imagination - it has all been exaggerated and nothing out of the ordinary has actually happened at all.
To Zylo first - no. A simple answer to a simple question - no, i am not happy about it. It has never been about happiness - nobody wants the hospital to close, they have only ever not wanted to die there unnecessarily. I have heard tell of Julie Bailey 'wanting' it to close, but quite frankly after your last one-sided report of her words i'm unlikely to take at face value what any of her enemies say about her ever again.
To skwalker1964 i say this - i admit i have not followed this story as closely as i might, but today i took the advice of M.D. when he said -
If you only have time to read one Francis report, make it his first independent inquiry, published in February 2010.
Here it is . This is not politics or ideology, this is not point-scoring pettiness, this is not yah-boo-sucks - this is real stories about real people being let down, and even put down.
Nobody loves the NHS more than i do, though i dare say most people love it just as much, but i fail to see how or why living in a state of denial about its shortcomings is helpful. How can we hope to make things better if we refuse to acknowledge that things have gone wrong?