Tumble weed
Well-Known Forumite
Although I guess they could resubmit, 51 seems to be a very hight number, maybe 30-40 would be more realistic.
Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
So in a nutshell, if it has to remain for offices or financial purposes, it will be left empty and derelict for years to come.This
Congratulations!So in a nutshell, if it has to remain for offices or financial purposes, it will be left empty and derelict for years to come.
This
Yes, I've just been reading through the documentation myself. This looks like a technical decision, i.e. the developer made an incorrect application for change of use, so it had to be refused.Thanks.
If this is the decision notice then the application to convert the building for residential use has not been refused. The council have merely refused to accept that the application to change the use of a building fan be done under permitted development rights.
For those of you that don't know permitted development rights allow works to be done without planning permission be required, e.g certain change of uses or small extensions to your home etc.
I expect the applicant will now submit a planning application
or just mention the magic word "rugby"?... the developer can now come back with a proper planning application...
... and a brown envelope, a few cases of Jack Daniels, and a fortnight in the Caymans?
The new lights on the row of shops opposite the old Jobcentre are quite swish.
They're spent a fair bit of money and time modernising the block.The new lights on the row of shops opposite the old Jobcentre are quite swish.
The simple 2-colour paint job looks good...The new lights on the row of shops opposite the old Jobcentre are quite swish.
Swish
Tinny word
Job
Woody word
Permission is granted by default
Permitted Development
B1 to C3
If the building is not offices , what the hell is it?
Battleship!