Union Strikes at Perkins, Stafford - 2010

Theorum

Old Skool Vet
tek-monkey said:
Would like to add that we are only getting 0.2% this year, which is obviously way below inflation. I understand the union are holding a strike ballot, be interesting to see what happens. I'm happy to have a job I like though, and perfectly understand the reasoning behind this decision. Regardless of how the union vote I'm not part of them, and will be in work regardless. I assume you lose a days pay if you strike? If so thats 1/260(ish) of my pay I'd lose, or about 0.4% per day I think? Nah, will def be giving this a wide berth. If I wanted high pay I wouldn't be with my employer in the first place, as they pay less than most other similar places in the area (and that is well known before you even apply).

I'd probably feel differently if my employer was minted though!
Life's a balance, never forget that!
 

Withnail

Well-Known Forumite
Walter said:
Everyone in Caterpillar in the UK hasn't had an increase since 2008, so Stafford employees aren't alone. In case Theorum didn't notice, there was a global recession and the company has been trying to keep its head above water and rebuild its business. It's a business, not a cooperative!
Walter (show all posts) has been rather quiet since the dividend information came to light, what?
 

Ben

Well-Known Forumite
Very difficult topic and inflation is now becoming a concern. Just using my own common sense (which isnt great!) id imagine that the latest set of accounts may show a profit but large companies like Perkins, Caterpillar, Alstom will know what is in their order books moving forwards and will set their budgets accordingly. The latest set of accounts may be using income from orders made before the recession even kicked in.

Shareholder value is a separate topic but if no returns are given to shareholders then the city will not look favourably and stock brokers will recommend better performing shares to their clients resulting in less investment. Millions of pounds could be wiped off a companies worth within a few days endangering (killing) more jobs.

My own employers have not provided a pay rise for 3 years but I work for a good company and Ive seen how our clients are struggling, gone out of business or directors have even faced personal bankruptcy trying to look after their staff. Ive accepted that I'm happy where im working and the country needs to take its medicine as it a wounded animal right now.

Here's to growing the stafford economy, creating more jobs and working hard to ensure Stafford remains the pride of Staffordshire.
 

Walter

A few posts under my belt
OK, dividends. I thought most employees were shareholders as a result of Caterpillar's generous share purchase scheme (basically buy 2, get one free) so why should employees complain about the company paying dividends? They should be delighted! Other profits are needed to pay for investments like new production lines, new products and acquisitions which keep Cat ahead of the competition. Making money to reward shareholders and invest in the company's future while paying employees in line with the local market sounds like a common sense, real world approach to me.
 

Theorum

Old Skool Vet
Walter said:
OK, dividends. I thought most employees were shareholders as a result of Caterpillar's generous share purchase scheme (basically buy 2, get one free) so why should employees complain about the company paying dividends? They should be delighted! Other profits are needed to pay for investments like new production lines, new products and acquisitions which keep Cat ahead of the competition. Making money to reward shareholders and invest in the company's future while paying employees in line with the local market sounds like a common sense, real world approach to me.
Genius, so why aren't people satisfied?
 

tek-monkey

wanna see my snake?
They didn't buy the shares? Or the dividend per share isn't actually that great, because there are so many shares issued? Although if they used their bonus every year to buy shares (it being a freebie effectively) they'd have a continuous revenue stream as long as the factory is profitable.

To know if it was worth it I'd need to know cost per share and dividend paid out though, could be worthless.
 

Walter

A few posts under my belt
Theorum said:
Walter said:
OK, dividends. I thought most employees were shareholders as a result of Caterpillar's generous share purchase scheme (basically buy 2, get one free) so why should employees complain about the company paying dividends? They should be delighted! Other profits are needed to pay for investments like new production lines, new products and acquisitions which keep Cat ahead of the competition. Making money to reward shareholders and invest in the company's future while paying employees in line with the local market sounds like a common sense, real world approach to me.
Genius, so why aren't people satisfied?
Because they aren't living in the real world. Just listen to the news...
 

Walter

A few posts under my belt
tek-monkey said:
They didn't buy the shares? Or the dividend per share isn't actually that great, because there are so many shares issued? Although if they used their bonus every year to buy shares (it being a freebie effectively) they'd have a continuous revenue stream as long as the factory is profitable.

To know if it was worth it I'd need to know cost per share and dividend paid out though, could be worthless.
A since Caterpillar share currently costs about $96/97 dollars and has paid a dividend of 44 cents ($0.40) per share for the last few quarters. What do you think, Withnail? The dividend news that "came to light" (it's issued publicly every quarter) is hardly earth-shattering!
 

shoes

Well-Known Forumite
tek-monkey said:
They didn't buy the shares? Or the dividend per share isn't actually that great, because there are so many shares issued? Although if they used their bonus every year to buy shares (it being a freebie effectively) they'd have a continuous revenue stream as long as the factory is profitable.

To know if it was worth it I'd need to know cost per share and dividend paid out though, could be worthless.
Surely the scope for share value increase is far more important than the dividend payments at this level? I do agree with you about buying shares with bonuses though, makes sense.
 

tek-monkey

wanna see my snake?
So if the dividends are so crap, yet the profits so good, where are they going? How much cash is Cat sitting on? And more to the point, why? If you have shareholders then they are your owners, I thought the profit went to them via a dividend? If the profit goes elsewhere, what point the shares?

Of course if you'd purchased shares this time last year you'd have made about 70% profit on them simply through price rises.

EDIT: More in fact, as it was B2GOF for employees so you'd have more than doubled your money.
 

shoes

Well-Known Forumite
Presumably you can buy shares in caterpillar manufacturing and the profits are recorded, on the whole, by another company perhaps caterpillar elite shareholder ltd ;)

(an example of how it might work, I have no idea how caterpillar is set up, who owns which shares of what etc. - there is NO FACT in the above - just a posibility).

Also I would imagine that caterpillar has millions of shares issued these days, so each one will get 1/total shares of the net profit allocated for dividends.

I have a small number of shares in a well known company which pay less than that, and they consistently announce year on year increases in profit. Their value has increased 10 times (at least) what I have been paid in dividends.
 

Withnail

Well-Known Forumite
Walter said:
What do you think, Withnail? The dividend news that "came to light" (it's issued publicly every quarter) is hardly earth-shattering!
This topic started with a question about why the staff were striking and whether it was justified. I come at it from a position of sympathy for people sticking up for themselves - you come at it from an opposite position.

I have no connection with Perkins whatsoever, i can't help but notice you have commented on this issue only.

How much of a big deal the dividend is rather depends on how many shares have been issued.
 

basil

don't mention the blinds
Walter said:
tek-monkey said:
They didn't buy the shares? Or the dividend per share isn't actually that great, because there are so many shares issued? Although if they used their bonus every year to buy shares (it being a freebie effectively) they'd have a continuous revenue stream as long as the factory is profitable.

To know if it was worth it I'd need to know cost per share and dividend paid out though, could be worthless.
A since Caterpillar share currently costs about $96/97 dollars and has paid a dividend of 44 cents ($0.40) per share for the last few quarters. What do you think, Withnail? The dividend news that "came to light" (it's issued publicly every quarter) is hardly earth-shattering!
Though probably earth-moving......
 

shoes

Well-Known Forumite
tek-monkey said:
Does company value / share value = shares issued?
I don't know tbh - John Marwood will know, he seems to know a thing or two about business.
 

Gramaisc

Forum O. G.
basil said:
Walter said:
tek-monkey said:
They didn't buy the shares? Or the dividend per share isn't actually that great, because there are so many shares issued? Although if they used their bonus every year to buy shares (it being a freebie effectively) they'd have a continuous revenue stream as long as the factory is profitable.

To know if it was worth it I'd need to know cost per share and dividend paid out though, could be worthless.
A since Caterpillar share currently costs about $96/97 dollars and has paid a dividend of 44 cents ($0.40) per share for the last few quarters. What do you think, Withnail? The dividend news that "came to light" (it's issued publicly every quarter) is hardly earth-shattering!
Though probably earth-moving......
Now, basil, stop digging.
 

Striker1

A few posts under my belt
Theorum said:
Once listened to someone of importance tell me "it's all worked out on the local environment".

Average house price Peoria, IL, USA. - 119526 USD = 74823 GBP
Average house price Stafford, Staffs, UK, - 120000 GBP = 191700 USD

National Hourly Rate Data
Peoria Stafford
Production Machinist $18.79 £9.70
Welder, Cutter, Solderer, or Brazer $19.33 £9.70
Engine or Other Machine Assembler $17.39 £9.70
Machinist Set Up Operator $18.99 £9.70
Mechanical Engineer $24.49 £? (Anyone care to fill in the blanks) lol
Assembler $15.69 £9.70
Warehouse Worker $13.39 £8.70

Average wage! - 9.7000 GBP = 15.4957 USD
this is interesting,i might ask for a transfer


and what the hell are stafford points?
 

CreamCake

Well-Known Forumite
Looks like the strike is collapsing, all the blokes are back at work next week except for the maintenance department who are out for two weeks.
The only thing our maintenance department guys do is stop the coffee machine from falling over.:D
 
Top