Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
Off hand I can't think of any who do play overseas ...
Are we the only household in Stafford (apart from Gramaisc) who hasn't put the telly on once to watch the World Cup?
I don't need to watch it tho, there's so many armchair experts on Facebook, I get a blow by blow account of each and every kick every 2 seconds.
Are we the only household in Stafford (apart from Gramaisc) who hasn't put the telly on once to watch the World Cup?
My boys (said in best Barbara Windsor accent) prefer the F1. Neither are footy fans.I sincerely fecking hope so...
Had a great idea this morning.
What people tend to forget is that there is a rather gruelling elimination process before 'we' get anywhere near the finals. This is why Scotland, for example, aren't in Brazil and 'we' are. This, truth be told, feeds in to a third thing that i am unable to 'let lie' but will in this instance do so because, well, feck it, sort of thing.How about if we put the names of every unemployed male between the ages of 18 & 25 with two working legs into a draw, then every 4 years we select 20 of them for a footballing holiday abroad.
At the risk of picking proverbial nits, none of those years were actually World Cup years. To answer the question, '86 and '90, yes 'we' did - within reason.Blaming foreign players is nonsense. how many foreign players were in English football in 1972, 1976, 1980, 1984? Did we do well in the World Cup? Did we hell!!
Are we the only household in Stafford (apart from Gramaisc) who hasn't put the telly on once to watch the World Cup?
I don't need to watch it tho, there's so many armchair experts on Facebook, I get a blow by blow account of each and every kick every 2 seconds.
There are two things in this thread that i find myself unable to 'let lie' -
Firstly
What people tend to forget is that there is a rather gruelling elimination process before 'we' get anywhere near the finals. This is why Scotland, for example, aren't in Brazil and 'we' are. This, truth be told, feeds in to a third thing that i am unable to 'let lie' but will in this instance do so because, well, feck it, sort of thing.
Secondly
At the risk of picking proverbial nits, none of those years were actually World Cup years. To answer the question, '86 and '90, yes 'we' did - within reason.
But you are certainly right that it had, and still has, nothing to do with any sort of 'quota' of foreign players - more so that it has nothing to do with 'facilities'. Lucas is right, too.
What is the one thing that England players, at least the bunch on this bench (coz it should be a bench of players should it not?) in Brasil, lack?
Meritocracy is dead in English football.
There are two things in this thread that i find myself unable to 'let lie' -
Firstly
What people tend to forget is that there is a rather gruelling elimination process before 'we' get anywhere near the finals.
Well we're at the finals, which is more than can be said for Denmark.