Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
Wasn't that a Gary Glitter album track?.Chick said:Age is nothing but a number.
There are other obstacles, you knowcookie_monster said:....it gives me hope
Story of my lifecookie_monster said:and i love that fact that laughed until she cried when he popped the question.
Paging tek to this threadTrumpet said:19-29 appears not so OK.
i agree, and to be honest, if their ages hadnt been mentioned, i would never have known there was such difference, let alone who was the eldest.Trumpet said:I reckon the older the couple the less the age difference shows itself 79-89 looks OK 19-29 appears not so OK.
Just reckon that at their age they've had pretty similar life experiences.
What would you consider an OK age difference for couples in that age bracket?Trumpet said:19-29 appears not so OK.
I don't personaly think there's an OK or not OK age difference in any age bracket once a couple are over 18, just pointing out that the difference appears more marked at an earlier age.Chick said:What would you consider an OK age difference for couples in that age bracket?Trumpet said:19-29 appears not so OK.
69 with an 89 year old. Ewwwwwww.zakkwylde87 said:69 - 89 ... doesn't seem that bad. All too old for me to consider. Unless the price was right...
lolTrumpet said:I could've quoted 16-26 but that would probably have sent the thread off at a tangent.