DEEPCUT: THE SILENT WITNESS
Cheryl James
STARTLING evidence casting new light on the death of Cheryl James at Deepcut barracks has been obtained by Private Eye. Disturbing statements made by the camp doctor to police, kept secret for eight years, should now nudge Nick Clegg to fulfil the Liberal Democrats’ long-standing promise to hold a full public inquiry.
The revelations provide yet more proof that Sir Nicholas Blake’s muddle-headed “review” – the Labour government’s “final word” on the fatal shootings of four young recruits at the army training camp – falls far short of the thorough independent investigation that is supposed to take place when someone has died while in the care of the state.
The “new evidence” comes from details of police interviews with Dr Alexandra McClenahan, who was the camp’s doctor and medical officer at the time of the deaths of 20-year-old Sean Benton and Cheryl James, 18, in 1995. Dr McClenahan had been called to the scene when Cheryl’s body was discovered with a single gunshot wound to the head, near one of the camp’s gates on the morning of 27 November. She pronounced the recruit dead.
Under pressure to suggest suicide Dr McClenahan told Surrey police (who were called in to re-investigate the two deaths in 2002, after two more recruits, Geoff Gray, 17, and James Collinson, 18, were also found shot on the base) that four things struck her about Cheryl’s death: it was extremely unusual for women to commit suicide by shooting; for someone said to be so anxious or depressed to kill themselves, the shot seemed to be too accurately positioned; the positioning of the body, especially the arms, appeared strange for someone who had supposedly shot themselves; and the rifle appeared too neatly placed alongside the body. She added that the practice nurse who also attended the scene shared her doubts.
Dr McClenahan voiced these concerns to commanding officers and to the army police investigators. But she said she came under pressure to suggest that Cheryl must have committed suicide, and was told that she must not have noticed that Cheryl was depressed when she attended her regular service medical three days before her death. In fact the doctor said Cheryl’s only concerns then were that mild migraines she sometimes suffered might hinder her posting elsewhere. She was assured they would not and was passed fit for service anywhere.
Excluded from the post-mortem examination
The doctor said that, contrary to usual practice – even in the event of a death by natural causes at the base – she was excluded from attending the post-mortem examination and the army’s internal inquiry.
Whatever her unproven suspicions about Cheryl’s death, this evidence buried in Surrey police files which have been kept secret from the families (but were available to Blake) raises a number of crucial questions. First, it makes the failure to carry out even the most basic forensic examination and protection of the scene, the body or the weapon, inexcusable. Cheryl’s clothes were destroyed, there was no test of her hands or forehead for gunshot residue; and fingerprints were not taken from the weapon either. It has always been said that this was because there was an assumption that Cheryl had committed suicide, but this is now flatly contradicted by the doctor called to the scene.
Her account also calls into question the destruction of the rounds of ammunition recovered from the weapon found alongside Cheryl’s body, and it makes the disappearance of fragments of bullet recovered from Cheryl’s skull highly suspicious. No proper explanation for either has ever been advanced, but it means that there is no proof that the weapon found alongside Cheryl’s body fired the fatal shot, nor any indication of who pulled the trigger.
‘Murder more likely’
Ballistics experts called in by Surrey police relied mainly on photographs and reconstruction to conclude that while the evidence appeared consistent with a self-inflicted shot, it was not conclusive. But Frank Swann, a former police ballistics expert called in by Cheryl’s family, concluded that murder was a more likely scenario, arguing that the black deposits seen in pictures were consistent with her trying to force the weapon away from her face.
The latest development also raises more questions about the accounts given by Cheryl’s boyfriend, one of the last people to see her alive at the barracks gates on the morning of her death. It also casts doubt over how Sir Nicholas Blake decided Cheryl’s death was “on the balance of probability” a suicide, speculating that her love life was causing her concern and mentioning that she had once, aged 15, self-harmed – by taking five paracetamol tablets and reporting it to a teacher, following the suicide of a cousin. The doctor’s evidence of Cheryl’s behaviour only days before her death was that she was far from suicidal and was more consistent with accounts from friends and family that she was “her happy normal self”.
Clegg’s promise
As well as providing more details about Cheryl’s death, Dr McClenahan also told police about increasing tension at the camp as a result of financial restraint and staff redundancies. Recruits’ welfare suffered as result. We know from the Blake report that Deepcut was at times out of control, with vulnerable young trainees exposed to risks their parents could not have imagined. Dr McClenahan’s evidence adds weight to those findings.
Did Blake take account of her evidence when he reviewed the case? Did he even see it? Did Surrey police draw his attention to it? Certainly they kept Cheryl’s family in the dark about it. And if this is just a few pages of evidence, what else is buried in the thousands of pages of unseen material? We many never find out unless the new deputy prime minister fulfils his party’s promise of a proper inquiry.