Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
Particularly amused by Mr John Beckwith, who supports the application because he will now not have to drive there and can instead walk. The walking distance between the entrances to the two sites is only half a mile, and when you take into account the length of Timberfield Road (to have an estimate of the length that blackberry drive will be before you hit the car parks) that distance change is down to less than 0.3 miles. By my very rough calculations the new site will remove 4-5 minutes of walking from Mr Beckwiths journey.
From the last round...So just to understand Wednesday a little better....
The Planning Committee or those who don't bottle it, will go to Doxey Marshes at 1.30 to glance at a few fields from a mini bus In the absence of the Stafford Borough Council Planning Case Officer who is away?
Then they come back to Riverside ( by boat?) to confirm a decision they have already made and those people who will decide the Marshes are built on are as follows
Conservative for Swynnerton BRIAN PRICE
Conservative for Holmcroft BRYAN CROSS
Conservative for Fulford MICHAEL DODSON
Conservative for Milwich ANDREW HARP
Conservative for Barlaston GARETH JONES
Conservative for Haywood ALAN PERKINS
Conservative for Fulford PETER ROYCROFT
Conservative for Church Eaton RAY SUTHERLAND
Conservative for Rowley CAROLYN TROWBRIDGE
Independent for Forebridge CHRISTINE BARON
v
Labour for Coton BILL KEMP
Labour for Highfields MAUREEN BOWMAN
Labour for Littleworth ROWAN DRAPER
It's going to be a Rugby score is it not?
I was quite enthused at the idea of this being 'called in' by the Big Boys.Could this be a way to simply authorise the decision of the planning committee at a higher level to try to stop a local backlash? If called in, then decided it doesn't apply to them, they effectively are rubber stamping the decision at a national level which could make appeals more difficult?
Yes Mr Cross how embarrassing for a quashing order on an application you approved by delegated powers , as chairman you must be a proud man !
I was quite enthused at the idea of this being 'called in' by the Big Boys.
Now i realise the error of my ways.
The Big Boys aren't being summoned to protect us - or the Marshes - they are being summoned to protect their Little Brother.
Remember the dick at school whose brother in the year above was the 'hardest' kid in the school? Remember not arguing with him because his brother would kick your arse?
It's a good job that we don't live in such a world now that we're all grown up, isn't it?
From the last round...
DRAPER declared a potential conflict, stating that he had once played for the club but no longer did so, that was not seen as material. His was an Aye.
It wasn't drawn upon Party lines - about half of them declared an interest in one way or another, so absolved themselves of any kind of duty. Some were absent without leave of their senses - much in the same way that the Planning Officer has Planned to not Officiate this time round.
This was unanimous last time round on the nod of half of the amount of people named ^above - i don't expect it to be any different this time.
This does not make any of them less complicit.
MAL?
So kids cannot support something which may benefit them?Surely how low can get to fill the Craddock Rooms with children to sway a decision ? , They cannot vote unless they are trying to pull on heart strings or even some may be grand parents (the decision makers ) you never know
I would say not in a democracy, or they would get the chance to voteSo kids cannot support something which may benefit them?
That's rubbishI would say not in a democracy, or they would get the chance to vote