Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
So our immoral council have money for a road to only increase car usage, but no money for the care of our elderly and needy. They can all go f*ck themselves as far as I'm concerned
They may be less bothered about increased car usage than making as-yet-unbuilt housing units look more accessible to potential purchasers..?So our immoral council have money for a road to only increase car usage, but no money for the care of our elderly and needy. They can all go f*ck themselves as far as I'm concerned
Just remember that come the next election.
but isnt this road going to be self funding how much money is 3000 new houses this road allows to be built going to generate per year. the national dept is still getting bigger. we need to learn to live within our means. from a goverment level they need to spend less or raise taxes or both. where should the axe fall. social care is protected to an extent as they heave to meet certin legal commitments.
You don't need to have more vehicles to have more traffic. There are places that I don't drive because it's just too much aggro to do so. Traffic is about vehicle use. A parked vehicle (that is not obstructing the highway) is having no input into 'traffic'.The old "more roads means more traffic" argument always puzzles me! Is there somebody sat in a factory saying, "they've built another road, we best get some more cars made!"
Nothing will change after the next election.Just remember that come the next election.
Nothing will change after the next election.
Gandhi..?Be the change you want to see
Dunno where that originates, but I like it, and try to live my life by it!
Farage.Gandhi..?
Jackson?Be the change you want to see
Dunno where that originates, but I like it, and try to live my life by it!