Welcome to Stafford Forum. Please or sign-up and start posting!
This is a trick question. There are no railway stations in Newcastle-under-Lyme...........................................................nor baths.If a train leaves Newcastle at 1.30pm, how long will it take to fill the bath
Show working out on a separate paper if necessary
So you've given up understanding what the House is trying to do, yet you are happy, outwith any attempt at understanding, to describe it as a 'fiasco', and happy to describe the participants as 'morons'?This is Lefroy's voting record on the fiasco today - I'll admit that I've given up trying to even understand what these morons are pretending to be trying to do now...
- Against No-deal: Leaving the EU on 12 April without a deal (John Baron's proposal - 160 for, 400 against)
- For Common Market 2.0: Remaining in the European single market and seeking a temporary customs union with the EU (Nick Boles' proposal - 188 for, 283 against)
- For EFTA and EEA: Remaining in the European single market but not forming a customs union with the EU (George Eustice's proposal - 65 for, 377 against)
- For Customs union: Seeking a UK-wide customs union with the EU (Ken Clarke's proposal - 264 for, 272 against)
- Did not vote Labour's alternative plan: Negotiating changes to the withdrawal agreement so that it includes protections to workers' rights, a permanent customs union, and close alignment to the single market (Jeremy Corbyn's proposal - 237 for, 307 against)
- Did not vote Revoke Article 50: Cancelling Brexit if the UK gets within days of leaving the EU without a deal (Joanna Cherry's proposal - 184 for, 293 against)
- Did not vote Second referendum: Holding another public vote to confirm any withdrawal agreement agreed by Parliament (Margaret Beckett's proposal - 268 for, 295 against)
- Did not vote Standstill arrangement: Seeking a tariff-free trade agreement with the EU that will last for two years, during which time Britain will contribute to the EU budget (Marcus Fysh's proposal - 139 for, 422 against)
So you've given up understanding what the House is trying to do, yet you are happy, outwith any attempt at understanding, to describe it as a 'fiasco', and happy to describe the participants as 'morons'?
Perhaps you ought to think about that.
No shocks - as he has already ignored his constituents, the last thing he wants is for them to have their say. Sadly, they will still vote him in at the next GE
I still find it amazing that his vote has gone up at every election.No shocks - as he has already ignored his constituents, the last thing he wants is for them to have their say. Sadly, they will still vote him in at the next GE
Other confectionery items are available.What is it the Yorkies say: "There's nowt so queer as folk."
A... rather myopic, point of view...
It is interesting that you accuse me of being short-sighted when you appear to 'see' so much.... as he has already ignored his constituents...
At the end of the day it gets dark
There, corrected your post
And well done for not mentioning the War